Back
MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI
Bhim Bahadur Kami – Appellant
Versus
State of Sikkim – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Meenakshi Madan Rai, J. - The Petitioners are aggrieved by the impugned Order dated 17-12-2019 issued by the Additional District Magistrate-cum-Additional District Collector, Headquarters, East District, at Gangtok (Respondent No.3), in COI Case No.27/DM/East of 2018 (Nim Pincho Bhutia v. Bhim Bahadur Kami), whereby the Certificate of Identification ( COI ) issued to each of the Petitioners was cancelled. The Judgment/Final Order dated 13-10-2020, issued by the Appellate Authority, Land Revenue & Disaster Management Department (Respondent No.2), upheld the impugned Order supra in Appeal Case No.01 of 2020. The Petitioners are before this Court, assailing both.
2(i). A brief factual narrative is essential for a just determination of the matter. The Petitioners claim to be descendants of one Late Gumaney Kami and his wife Late Echu Maya, the Petitioner No.1 being the son of the said persons, while the Petitioners No.2 to 6 claim to be their grandsons, being the sons of the Petitioner No.1. Gumaney Kami undisputedly was a Sikkimese, holding a Sikkim Subject Certificate (SSC) bearing Sikkim Subject Register Serial No.32, Volume Number II, under Block Sajong, issued on 06-11-19
The cancellation of Certificates of Identification was found illegal, arbitrary, and violative of natural justice principles, reaffirming the validity of previous verifications that established petit....
The cancellation of Certificates of Identification was deemed illegal due to violations of natural justice, requiring proper inquiry and opportunity for defense.
The court reaffirmed that the right to a fair hearing is fundamental and that administrative actions must adhere to principles of natural justice.
Caste claim – Forged and fabricated - - Forefather of the respondent no.3 were “Sikh Chamar”, the respondent no.2 accepted the caste claim of the respondent no.3 as “Mochi” which is a separate caste ....
The court confirmed that the burden of proof for indigenous identity lies with the petitioner, reinforcing that DNA testing cannot be mandated without consent and administrative decisions must adhere....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that a person with a case based on falsehood has no right to approach the Court, and knowingly producing fabricated and fraudulent documents to ....
The Caste Scrutiny Committee lacks the authority to review a validated caste certificate; it can only cancel it if fraud is proven, and must afford a fair hearing as dictated by principles of natural....
The National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes lacks jurisdiction to investigate individual caste status claims, which violates natural justice principles.
Point of law : As seen from sub-rule (10) of Rule 9, the Commissioner of Tribal Welfare/Director of Tribal Welfare, either suo motu or on a written complaint by any person made by an employer/educati....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
