F. I. REBELLO, S. C. CHAURASIA, DEVI PRASAD SINGH
ANURAG BANSAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
By the Court.—In pursuance to reference made by a Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.10.2010 passed in bunch of writ petitions, leading one of which is Purvanchal Advertising Association v. State of U.P., 2011(2) ADJ 161 (DB)(LB) instant Full Bench has been constituted.
2. The bunch of writ petitions have been filed by the advertising agencies challenging the vires of the Municipal Corporation (Assessment and Collection of Tax on Advertisement) Rules, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) mainly on the ground that the Rules are ultra vires to the constitutional mandate enshrined under Article 19(1)(a) and 19 (1)(g) of the Constitution of India. Rule has been also impugned being framed in contravention of statutory provisions contained in the U.P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the Act.).
3. While making reference vide order dated 28.10.2010, the Division Bench of this Court at Lucknow had shown its disagreement to a judgment of another Division Bench delivered at Allahabad whereby identical writ petition was dismissed. The case is in Taj Advertising and others v. State of U.P. and others, 2010(5) ADJ 272 (DB). It would be conve
(1989) 4 SCC 155 : 1989 ALJ 1047 (SC) (Para 14)
(2010) 3 SCC 765 (Para 36)-Referred and discussed.
2000(1) LLJ 1123 (Bom) (Para 50)
2001(II) LLJ 1679 (MP) (Para 51)
2005(III) LLJ 1077 (1084) (SC) (Para 49)-Discussed.
AIR 1974 SC 1669 : (1974) 4 SCC 98
AIR 1978 SC 1457 : (1978) 3 SCC 558 (Para 68)
(1984) 2 SCC 50 : AIR 1984 SC 192 (Para 85)
(1984) 3 SCC 127 : AIR 1984 SC 1130 (Para 68)
AIR 1990 SC 40 : (1989) Supp (1) SCC 430 (Para 68)
AIR 1997 SC 2507 : (1997) 5 SCC 516 (Para 68)
(2009) 15 SCC 570 (Para 78)-Considered
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.