Suneeta Singh vs State Of U. P. - 2021 Supreme(All) 481

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(All) 481

YASHWANT VARMA
Suneeta Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : J.P. Singh, Yadvendra Pratap Singh Counsel
For the Respondent: Durga Singh, Syed Nadeem Ahmad

Table of Content
1. court hears the counsel for both parties. (Para 1 , 2)
2. engagement details under kgbv scheme. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. issues of maintainability and contracts. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. court's review of executive authority. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
5. regulatory context and evaluative criteria of employment. (Para 24 , 41 , 42)
6. final verdict of writ petitions. (Para 61)

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, Sri Yatindra, Sri Pankaj Kumar Tyagi, Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, Sri Harshvardhan Gupta, Sri Ram Vilas Yadav, Sri Amit Shukla, Sri Santosh Kumar, Sri Ashok Kumar, Sri Syed Nadeem Ahmad learned counsels for the Basic Education Officers, Sri Durga Singh who appears for the State Project Director, Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan and Sri Bipin Bihari Pandey learned Chief Standing Counsel alongwith Sri Sanjay Chaturvedi for the State respondents.

2. This batch of writ petitions have been clubbed and heard for final disposal collectively with the consent of parties.

A. KASTURBA GANDHI BALIKA VIDYALAYA

3. All the petitioners were engaged by the respondents in re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(All) 481

YASHWANT VARMASuneeta Singh – AppellantVersusState Of U. P. – Respondent

Cases Referred (17)

YASHWANT VARMA
Suneeta Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent