RAJESH BINDAL, PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Ram Chandra Mission through President – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAJESH BINDAL, CJ.
1. This order will dispose of a bunch of 11 Special Appeals and one writ petition. The Special Appeals arise out of a common order passed by the learned Single Judge dated July 10, 2015. The writ petition, inter alia, challenges the orders dated February 21, 2015 and October 12, 2015 whereby the list of the members of the working committee for the year 2015-16 has been approved and the registration certificate of Ram Chandra Mission (Society) for the year 2015-2020 has been renewed.
2. The issue primarily pertains to control and management of Shri Ram Chandra Mission, namely, appellant No.1 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Mission’). It is said to be a spiritual society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).
3. At the time of hearing, it was not disputed that there are two rival groups, who are seeking to retain the management of the Mission. One set of persons is the appellants (hereinafter referred to as ‘Group-I’) whereas another set is the private respondents (hereinafter referred to as ‘Group-
ABCD Vs. Union of India and others (2020) 2 SCC 52
Abhyudya Sanstha Vs. Union of India
Amar Singh v. Union of India and others
Chandra Shashi v. Anil Kumar Verma
Dhananjay Sharma Vs. State of Haryana and others
G. Narayanaswamy Reddy v. Govt. of Karnataka
Kishore Samrite v. State of Uttar Pradesh and others
Point of Law : Appellants do no deserve any relief from this Court, as they are not only guilty of concealment of material facts from Court but had also indulged in forum shopping. They made efforts ....
A litigant, who attempts to pollute the stream of justice or who touches the pure fountain of justice with tainted hands, is not entitled to any relief, interim or final. Suppression of material fact....
A litigant who approaches the court with unclean hands, by concealing material facts, is not entitled to any relief.
Point of Law : Making a false statement on oath is an offence punishable under Section 181 of the IPC while furnishing false information with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to....
(1) Contempt of court – A litigant who attempts to pollute stream of justice or who touches pure fountain of justice with tainted hands, is not entitled to any relief, interim or final.(2) Grant of b....
Suppression of material facts and failure to join necessary parties render a writ petition untenable; fraud on the court mandates dismissal of the case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the non-mentioning of details with regard to previous petitions and the order disposing of the said petitions was not deliberate material conc....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.