RAJESH BINDAL, PRAKASH PADIA
Bhaskar Rai – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The present petition has been filed, claiming to be in public interest, with a prayer that the second cancelled fair price shop be allotted to someone else and the authorities concerned be directed to investigate the issue regarding corruption in allotment of fair price shop in favour of respondent No. 3.
2. The petitioner, who appears in person, claims that he is a Software Engineer, based at Hyderabad, however, his parents and other family members reside in village. He is arguing his case through VC from Hyderabad.
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the petitioner had earlier filed Criminal Writ - Public Interest Litigation No. 1 of 2022 raising the issue regarding the same fair price shop. The same was dismissed by this Court vide order dated January 18, 2022. It was further submitted that there is one FIR registered against the petitioner on the complaint filed by respondent No. 3 as Case Crime No. 131 of 2021, under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 308 IPC at Police Station Bardah, District Azamgarh in which even charge-sheet has been filed.
4. The submission is that the aforesaid facts have not been disclosed in the present petit
Abhyudya Sanstha v. Union of India
G. Narayanaswamy Reddy v. Government of Karnataka
Moti Lal Songara v. Prem Prakash @ Pappu and another
Amar Singh v. Union of India and others
Kishore Samrite v. State of Uttar Pradesh and others
ABCD v. Union of India and others
Pushpadevi M. Jatia v. M.L. Wadhawan etc.
A litigant, who attempts to pollute the stream of justice or who touches the pure fountain of justice with tainted hands, is not entitled to any relief, interim or final. Suppression of material fact....
A litigant who approaches the court with unclean hands, by concealing material facts, is not entitled to any relief.
Point of Law : Making a false statement on oath is an offence punishable under Section 181 of the IPC while furnishing false information with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of approaching the court with clean hands and the consequences of suppression of material facts.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the non-mentioning of details with regard to previous petitions and the order disposing of the said petitions was not deliberate material conc....
Point of Law : Appellants do no deserve any relief from this Court, as they are not only guilty of concealment of material facts from Court but had also indulged in forum shopping. They made efforts ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.