JUDGMENT :

1. This is an appeal by the writ petitioner, who met with partial success before the learned Single Judge. He wants this Court to allow the writ petition in toto, modifying the judgment of the learned Judge.

2. The petitioner-appellant was a Consolidation Officer. On 9.11.2006, while posted at Agra, he was served with a charge-sheet in relation to certain judicial orders that he had made in the year 2003 at Farrukhabad. The learned Single Judge has quoted the charges in the judgment impugned, but it would be pertinent to reproduce some more details and particulars carried in the charge-sheet dated 9.11.2006, besides just the content of the charges. Charges Nos. 1 and 2, as set out in the charge-sheet, together with the reference to evidence, by which these were sought to be established, are extracted below:

^^vkjksi la[;k&1

vkius xzke ekS/kk tuin Q#Z[kkckn ds okn la[;k&592 /kkjk 9v esa ikfjr vkns’k fnukad 28&02&03 }kjk xzke ekS/kk ds xkVk la[;k&1285@0&60@1420@2&00 ls xzke lHkk dk uke [kkfjt djds vukj flag iq= ij’kqjke dk uke ntZ fd;kA rnksijkUr fu;e 109 ds vUrxZr okn la[;k&198 rkjh[k QSlyk 18&10&03 esa ikfjr vkns’kkuqlkj mDr vkns’k dk veynjken djk fn;kA ftlls xzke lHkk l