JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Rohan Gupta, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Prakhar Tondon, learned counsel for the opposite party.

Present revision has been filed with the following prayers:

“It is, therefore, Most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow the aforesaid revision and set aside the impugned order dated 07.02.2023 and the consequential decree dated 14.02.2023, passed by the Additional District Judge, Court No. 08, Kanpur Nagar in O.S. No. 73 of 2019; failing which the Revisionist shall suffer irreparable loss and injury.”

It is also prayed that the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to stay the effect and operation of the impugned order dated 07.02.2023 and the consequential decree dated 14.02.2023, passed by the Additional District Judge, Court No. 08, Kanpur Nagar in O.S. No. 73 of 2019.”

2. Since, only legal question is involved in this matter, therefore, with the consent of parties without inviting for affidavits, the matter is being decided at the admission stage itself.

3. Learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that revisionist-defendant was a tenant of Sri Kailash Nath Agarwal and after the death of Sri Kailash Nath