Ram Pyarey Singh VS State Of U. P. Thru Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Housing & Urban

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

IRSHAD ALI
Ram Pyarey Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Housing & Urban – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : A.P. Singh, Amarendra Pratap Singh
For the Respondent: Anupam Dwivedi, Ratnesh Chandra

Table of Content
1. factual background of the petitioner's tenure and disciplinary actions. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments against the disciplinary actions. (Para 5)
3. findings on violation of natural justice. (Para 10 , 11)
4. conclusion mandating the issuance of benefits to the petitioner. (Para 13)

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Shri A.P. Singh, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Amrendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondent no.1, Shri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 and Shri Anupam Dwivedi, learned counsel for respondent no.3.

2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner is challenging orders dated 7.6.2017 and order dated 28.12.2019 issued by the Tehsildar, Lucknow (Annexure Nos.11 and 12 to the writ petition) with further prayer of a writ of Mandamus commanding the respondents to pay regular pension to the petitioner, commutation of pension and arrears of pension revised from the date and 7th pay commission with effect from 1.1.2016 with all benefits of services.

3. Facts of the case are that the petitioner was granted appointment on the post of second Clerk on 10.11.1967 in the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

IRSHAD ALIRam Pyarey Singh – AppellantVersusState Of U. P. Thru Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Housing & Urban – Respondent

Cases Referred (21)

IRSHAD ALI
Ram Pyarey Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Housing & Urban – Respondent