Back
SIDDHARTHA VARMA
Vinod Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
1. The petitioner was appointed on the post of medical representative in the company known as M/s Tamilnadu Dada Pharmaceutical Limited. The service of the petitioner was confirmed on the post of Medical Representative on 28.10.1991 in the Agra region.
2. Thereafter, the company M/s Tamilnadu Dada Pharmaceutical Industries Limited was merged in the company known as M/s Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and the petitioner became an employee of the company into which the employer company had merged i.e. he became an employee of M/s Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited.
3. On 5.9.2002, the petitioner was transferred to Bedar (Karnataka). On 16.11.2002, as luck would have it, the respondent no. 3 the Employer Company, terminated the services of the petitioner. Aggrieved thereafter, the petitioner raised an industrial dispute which was referred by the Government of Uttar Pradesh on 23.3.2006. The reference was to following effect:
^^D;k lsok;kstdksa }kjk Jh fouksn dqekj flag] esfMdy fjÁstsUVsfVo dh lsok;sa fnukad 16-11-2002 ls lekIr fd;k tkuk mfpr rFkk@vFkok oS/kkfud gS\ ;fn ugha] rks lacaf/kr Jfed D;k fgrykHk@mi'ke ikus dk vf/kdkjh gS ,oa vU; fdu fooj.kk
The jurisdiction of an Industrial Tribunal is based on the location of the cause of action, and it cannot extend to areas where the cause of action did not arise, even if related orders are served el....
The situs of employment is an important factor which determines the jurisdiction. The cause of action is to be determined by applying the principle as enumerated in Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The....
Labour/Industrial Courts in Maharashtra have jurisdiction to hear complaints of unfair labour practice if relevant decisions are made within Maharashtra, despite employee postings outside the State.
The Labour Court at Chandigarh has jurisdiction over the dispute as the decision to terminate the workman was made at the head office located there, despite the workman being posted in Tirupur.
THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT IS THE APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENT IN RELATION TO AN INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CONCERNING A CONTRACT LABOURER EMPLOYED AT THE OFFICE OF IBP/IOC SITUATED AT IBP HOUSE, 34A, NIRMAL CHANDRA S....
The Labour Court at Chandigarh has jurisdiction to adjudicate the termination claim as the decision to terminate was made at the head office in Chandigarh, establishing part of the cause of action th....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
