AJAY BHANOT
Ryen @ Ren Chao – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot, J.
1. The judgment is being structured in the following conceptual framework to facilitate the discussion:
| I | Introduction | ||
|
|
| A | The accused |
|
|
| B | F.I.R |
|
|
| C | Investigations |
| II | Submissions of learned counsels for the parties | ||
| III | Rights of Foreign Nationals: | ||
|
|
| A | Constitution of India |
|
|
| B | Right to fair trial |
|
|
| C | Right to seek bail : Considerations |
| IV | Merits: | ||
|
|
| A | Likelihood of the applicant committing the offence and material against him |
|
|
| B | Gravity of the offence & impact on society |
|
|
| C | Likelihood of the applicant reoffending |
| V | Flight Risk and Foreign Nationals : | ||
|
|
| A | System of sureties |
|
|
| B | Coercive jurisdiction of Courts |
|
|
| C | Stand of Government of India and State Government |
|
|
| D | Applicant as a flight risk : Assessment |
| VI | Conclusion | ||
I. Introduction :
I-A. The accused:
2. The accused in t
A.R.Antulay vs R.S.Nayak and Anr.
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab
Hussainara Khatoon and others (I) vs. Home Secretarty, State of Bihar
P. Rama Chandra Rao vs State of Karnataka
Sheela Barse and ors. vs Union of India and ors.
Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee representing undertrial Prisoners Vs. Union
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.