SALIL KUMAR RAI
Aditya Kumar Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh Road Transport Corporation, Head Quarters Tehri Kothi,Thru. Its Managing Director – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
1. Heard Shri Mohd. Ali, counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ratnesh Chandra, Advocate, representing the Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport, Corporation.
2. The petitioner was employed as conductor with Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport, Corporation (hereinafter referred to as, ‘Corporation’). On 1.11.2013, the petitioner was on duty in a 32 Seater Bus No. UP 57 T 2765 plying on the Gorakhpur-Padrauna route. The bus was inspected in mid route by a team led by the Transport Superintendent, Gorakhpur Region. The inspection team found that nine passengers in the bus were travelling without ticket.
3. On 2.11.2013, the inspection team submitted a report to the Regional Manager of the Corporation stating that, on inspection, nine passengers in the bus were found to be without ticket even though they had paid the fare. In his report, the Regional Manager noted that the nine passengers had deposed orally but had refused to give any written statement. It is relevant to note that the report does not disclose the contents of the oral statements of the nine passengers. The report also does not refer to any evidence in support of the finding that the petition
Deepali Gundu Surwase Vs. Krinti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya (D.Ed.) & Others
M.P. State Agro Industries Development Cooperation Ltd. & Another Vs. Jahan Khan
Nirmala J. Jhala Vs. State of Gujarat & Another
Pradeep Vs. Manganese Ore (INDIA) Limited & Others
State of A.P. Vs. Chitra Venkata Rao
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.