Back
SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
Dhananjay Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction details and context of appeal (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. appeal challenges trial court's conviction based on inadequate evidential support. (Para 2) |
| 3. defense argues lack of evidence and political motivation (Para 14) |
| 4. state presents evidence supporting prosecution (Para 15) |
| 5. court's considerations for suspension of sentence (Para 16 , 17 , 20) |
| 6. final conclusion on appeal and bail decision (Para 18 , 41) |
| 7. court emphasized need for substantive evidence linking to conviction. (Para 19) |
ORDER :
| INDEX |
| Contents |
| Conviction |
| Conviction details |
| Relief |
| Brief facts |
| Submissions on behalf of the appellants |
| Submissions on behalf of the State |
| Issue |
| Discussion & Conclusion about suspension of sentence |
| Discussion & Conclusion about stay of conviction |
In Re: Criminal Misc. Application (For Suspension of Sentence) Under Section 389 (1) Cr.P.C. No. 02 of 2024
1. The above mentioned appeal under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the appellants-Dhananjay Singh and Santosh Vikram Singh against the judgment of conviction dated 05.03.2024 and order of sentence dated 06.03.2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judg
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
