SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2104

SHAMIM AHMED
Aarfa Bano – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sikandar Zulqarnain Khan.

Table of Content
1. habeas corpus petition concerning illegal detention (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding maintainability and legal representation (Para 4 , 5)
3. final disposal of the habeas corpus petition (Para 6)

JUDGMENT :

SHAMIM AHMED, J.

1. Heard Shri Sikandar Zulqarnain Khan, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Sushil Kumar Mishra, the learned AGA-I for the State-respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and perused the record.

2. The present habeas corpus petition has been filed with the following prayer:

    “(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of habeas corpus directing the opposite parties to produce the detenue before this Hon'ble Court who is illegally detained by the opposite party No. 3 and 4 without any reason since 2021 and free to her from illegal custody.

    (ii) issue any other writ order or direction which this Hon'ble court may just and proper also kindly be passed in favour of the detenue.

    (iii) allow writ petition in favour of the detenue with costs.”

3. This petition has been filed by the father-in-law of the detenue, with the prayer that his daughter-in-law, who is married with the son of petitioner, is in illegal custody of her parents, thus, custody of detenue be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top