SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2004

SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, DONADI RAMESH
Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Pranjal Shukla.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Heard Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the assessee and Sri Ankur Agarwal, learned counsel for the revenue.

2. Pursuant to the earlier order, Sri Ankur Agarwal, learned counsel for the revenue has received written instructions. In absence of any dispute as to fact, the matter has been proceeded with the consent of parties at the fresh stage itself.

3. Challenge has been raised to the order dated 05.11.2022 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Sector-6, Aligarh for the tax period 2018-19, whereby demand in excess of Rs. 2,44,21,574/- has been raised against the present petitioner.

4. Solitary ground being pressed in the present petition is, the only notice in the proceedings was issued to the petitioner on 06.08.2022 seeking his reply within 30 days. Referring to item no. 3 of the table appended to that notice, it has been pointed out, the Assessing Authority had at that stage itself chosen to not give any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner by mentioning "NA" against column description "Date of personal hearing". Similar endorsements were made against the columns for "Time of personal hearing" and "Venue where personal hearing will be held". Thus, it

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top