IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Abdul Hameed – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. incident leading to fir and lack of charges against appellant. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. litigation history and procedural progression. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. arguments for the applicant's anticipatory bail application. (Para 10) |
| 4. state's opposition to the anticipatory bail application. (Para 11) |
| 5. court's analysis of the maintainability of the second bail application. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. discussion on the retrospective application of procedural laws. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. beneficial legislation principles applied to the applicant's case. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 8. relevant precedent supporting retrospective application of bnss. (Para 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 9. changed circumstances warranting reconsideration. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 10. analysis of factual circumstances and role of the applicant. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 11. conclusion and decision to allow anticipatory bail. (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 12. final directives and clarification of order. (Para 56 , 57) |
JUDGMENT :
Chandra Dhari Singh, J.
FACTUAL MATRIX
Occurrence of the Offence and FIR Lodging
1. On 13.08.2011, at approximately 08
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur & Others vs. State of Maharashtra & Others
Trilok Chand v. State of Himachal Pradesh.
M. Ravindran v. Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
The enactment of the BNSS allows for anticipatory bail applications to be considered retrospectively, removing restrictions previously imposed by Section 438(6) CrPC, thereby enabling relief for the ....
(1) Anticipatory bail petition – Once first anticipatory bail is denied without there being any change in fact situation, second application for same relief under Section 438 Cr.P.C. cannot be entert....
A second or successive anticipatory bail petition is maintainable only if substantial changes in circumstances are demonstrated; mere reiteration of previous grounds is insufficient.
The court denied anticipatory bail due to the serious nature of the charges, the applicant's extensive criminal history, and the risk of influencing witnesses.
The judgment establishes the principle that beneficial legislation, such as the restoration of anticipatory bail provisions, can have retrospective application to benefit individuals apprehending arr....
Second anticipatory bail petitions under Section 438 Cr.P.C. are maintainable if substantial changes in circumstances are demonstrated; mere reliance on new documents is insufficient.
Anticipatory bail applications can be granted under changed circumstances, providing protection against wrongful arrest while ensuring cooperation with the investigation.
(1) Anticipatory bail – Once anticipatory bail is granted, it ordinarily continues without fixed expiry – Filing of charge-sheet, taking of cognizance, or issuance of summons does not terminate prote....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.