IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Abdul Hameed – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Chandra Dhari Singh, J.
FACTUAL MATRIX
Occurrence of the Offence and FIR Lodging
1. On 13.08.2011, at approximately 08:15 AM, an incident occurred in Village Girdharpur, Police Station Devrania, District Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, leading to the lodging of FIR No. 647/2011 under Sections 302, 307, 323, and 504 the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (hereinafter “IPC”). The FIR was lodged by the informant, Firoz, alleging that the accused persons, including Abdul Hameed (applicant herein), along with one Javed Anwar, Anwar Jameer, and Babu, armed with licensed pistols, attacked the informant and his family members. The FIR alleged that the accused fired indiscriminately, resulting in the death of Guddu @ Zakir Husain, the informant’s uncle, who succumbed to a gunshot injury. The motive was attributed to prior animosity arising from Zila Panchayat elections and contractual disputes. The deceased was declared dead at Shri Ram Murti Hospital, and the postmortem conducted on 13.08.2011 revealed a single bullet injury with entry and exit wounds.
Investigation and Charge Sheet
2. The investigation was conducted by the police, and the charge sheet was filed on 07.11.2011 under Sections 302, 307
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur & Others vs. State of Maharashtra & Others
Trilok Chand v. State of Himachal Pradesh.
M. Ravindran v. Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
The enactment of the BNSS allows for anticipatory bail applications to be considered retrospectively, removing restrictions previously imposed by Section 438(6) CrPC, thereby enabling relief for the ....
(1) Anticipatory bail petition – Once first anticipatory bail is denied without there being any change in fact situation, second application for same relief under Section 438 Cr.P.C. cannot be entert....
A second or successive anticipatory bail petition is maintainable only if substantial changes in circumstances are demonstrated; mere reiteration of previous grounds is insufficient.
The court denied anticipatory bail due to the serious nature of the charges, the applicant's extensive criminal history, and the risk of influencing witnesses.
The judgment establishes the principle that beneficial legislation, such as the restoration of anticipatory bail provisions, can have retrospective application to benefit individuals apprehending arr....
Second anticipatory bail petitions under Section 438 Cr.P.C. are maintainable if substantial changes in circumstances are demonstrated; mere reliance on new documents is insufficient.
Anticipatory bail applications can be granted under changed circumstances, providing protection against wrongful arrest while ensuring cooperation with the investigation.
(1) Anticipatory bail – Once anticipatory bail is granted, it ordinarily continues without fixed expiry – Filing of charge-sheet, taking of cognizance, or issuance of summons does not terminate prote....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.