SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 89

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.
Sandhya & Ors. - Appellant
Versus
National Capital Territory Of Delhi & Anr. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 3155 of 2021 & CM. No. 9579 of 2021
Decided on : 23-03-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Deepak Aggarwal and Mr. Anand Landge, Advs.
For the Respondent: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mrs. Tania Ahlawat, Mr. N.K. Singh and Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advs.

Point of Law; whether Skill Test can be directed to be re-conducted when such a procedure is not contemplated in the Recruitment Rules - In the absence of a Rule, surely no direction for conducting the Skill Test can be given; and thirdly, even otherwise no such direction can be given in view of the decision of the Recruitment Committee which clearly held that there was no illegality in the conduct of the Skill Test

Headnote:

Re-conduct the Skill/Typing Test for the post of Personal Assistant - recruitment to the vacant posts of Senior Personal Assistant, Personal Assistant, Junior Judicial Assistant and Data Entry Operator for the Office of the District and Session Judge (HQ) and Office of Principal Judge, Family Courts (HQ) New Delhi

Finding of the Court:

petitioners for the reasons that firstly, the decision to conduct the retest was set aside by this Court on the ground that the Recruitment Rules does not permit so; secondly, no rule has been brought to my notice if the Skill Test/Typing Test held is illegal, then the Rule contemplates, a re-test can be conducted. In the absence of a Rule, surely no direction for conducting the Skill Test can be given; and thirdly, even otherwise no such direction can be given in view of the decision of the Recruitment Committee which clearly held that there was no illegality in the conduct of the Skill Test. Reliance has also been placed by the learned Counsel for the petitioners on the Judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Narender Sharma (supra) to contend that the Court has given a direction to conduct the Skill Test

Result: Petition dismissed

JUDGMENT :

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.

1. The present petition has been filed with the following prayers:

    “In view of foregoing, it is most respectfully prayed that:

(a) Issue Writ of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order and/or direction in the nature thereof, thereby directing the Respondents to quash and set aside Notice dated 07.12.2020 issued by Respondent No.2 whereby the Petitioners and other similarly situated candidates were called for the Skill Test/Typing Test for the post of Personal Assistant which was held from 29.12.2020 to 12.01.2021 in the various centers in the interest of justice; and

(b) Issue Writ of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order and/or direction in the nature thereof, thereby directing to the Respondents to re-conduct the Skill/Typing Test for the post of Personal Assistant which was held from 29.12.2020 to 12.01.2021 in the various centers in the interest of justice: and/or

(c) Issue Writ of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order and/or direction in the nature thereof, thereby directing to quash and set aside over all result of skill test for the Post of Personal Assistant (PA) declared on 15.02.2021 by the Respondents in the interest of justice: and/or

(d) any other order(s), which this Hon’ble High Court may deem fit and proper, under the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner and against the Respondents.”

2. It is noted from the petition that the Office of the District and Session Judge (HQ) had issued an advertisement and common instructions by way of public notice dated September 14, 2019 and invited applications for the recruitment to the vacant posts of Senior Personal Assistant, Personal Assistant, Junior Judicial Assistant and Data Entry Operator for the Office of the District and Session Judge (HQ) and Office of Principal Judge, Family Courts (HQ) New Delhi. It is stated in the said advertisement, the Office of the District and Session Judge (HQ) also issued common instructions to the candidates regarding educational qualification, important dates for the examination, skill test examination and general instructions. In this regard, I shall reproduce the relevant clauses of the said advertisement filed with the petition as Annexure-B. The relevant clauses read as under:

    13. EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION: - The details regarding name of the post(s), post codes, Exam Mode & educational qualifications as per the Recruitment Rules provided are as under:

Sl. No. Post Code Exam Mode Post Educational Qualification

01. A-1 Objective Test, Descriptive Test, Skill Test & Interview Senior Personal Assistant Graduate with speed of not less than 110 wpm in shorthand and 40 wpm in typewriting.

02. A-2 Objective Test, Descriptive Test, Skill Test & Interview Personal Assistant Graduate with speed of not less than 100 words per minute and typing speed of 40 words per minute and having knowledge of Computer.

    17. Scheme of examination:-

Tier-1:- The Objective & Descriptive Test for the post of Sr. Personal Assistant & Personal Assistant shall contain Questions on General English & Comprehension, General Knowledge (Including Current Affairs) and General Intelligence which would be qualifying in nature. The merit will be prepared on the basis of Descriptive Type Test.

Part Exam Type Subjects Questions Marks Duration of Exam. Total Duration/Timing for General Candidates Total Duration/Timing for(OL/BL Candidates).

Part-I Objective Type (MCQ) General English & Comprehension 50 50 90 Minutes Duration:- 90 Minutes Duration:- 120 Minutes

Part-II General Knowledge (including Current Affair) 20 20

Part-III General Intelligence 20 20

Total 90 90

Part-IV Descriptive Type (English Language) Essay (250 Words) 01 30 90 Minutes Duration:- 90 Minutes Duration:- 120 Minutes

Part-V Grammar 25 25

Part-VI Translation 20 20

Total 75 75

    Tier-1:- The Objective Test for the post

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top