SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 335

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Mamta Bisht – Appellant
Versus
Kailash Singh Bisht – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Revisionist :Mr. Rajesh Joshi, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Ravindra Maithani, J.

The challenge in this revision is made to the judgment and order 30.09.2022, passed in Misc. Criminal Case No. 32 of 2020, Smt. Mamta Bisht Vs. Shri Kailash Singh Bisht, by the court of Judge, Family Court, Almora (“the case”). By it, an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by the revisionist has been allowed and she has been awarded Rs.2000/- per month, as maintenance.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. The respondent has already been served, but despite service, he is not represented before this Court.

4. The impugned judgment and order reveals that the revisionist and the respondent no.2 were married on 15.08.2014. It was second marriage of both, the revisionist and the respondent. The revisionist had a daughter born out from her earlier husband. It is the case of the revisionist that after marriage, the respondent tortured her physically as well as mentally.

5. It has been the case of the revisionist that the respondent is a Government employee and he has other sources of income also.

6. The respondent appeared in the case and denied all the allegations. According to the respondent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top