MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT JABALBUR BENCH
A.M. Khanwilkar, Alok Aradhe, JJ.
Neetu Singh Markam - Appellant
Versus
State of M.P. - Respondent
Writ Petition Nos.1918, 6883, 7121, 7295, 7523, 7525, 7526, 7527, 7529, 7530, 7537, 7538, 7539, 7540, 7541, 7542, 7576, 7602, 7611, 7619, 7682, 7694, 7772, 7773, 7776, 7800, 7825, 7856, 7860, 7861, 7876, 7881, 7891, 7926, 7982, 8023, 8024, 8028, 8030, 8048, 8049, 8050, 8051, 8052, 8068, 8069, 8083, 8094, 8095, 8108, 8135, 8137, 8144, 8167, 8273, 8371, 8412, 8431, 8432, 8462, 8488, 8640, 8817, 8985, 8990, 8993, 9105, 9150, 9318, 9321, 9322, 9326, 9327, 9340, 9342, 9364, 9413, 9415, 9444, 9466, 9577, 9583, 9584, 9585, 9588, 9589, 9595, 9596, 9598, 9624, 9768, 9798, 9880, 9963, 9981, 10149, 10151, 10153, 10155, 10156, 10158, 10159, 10160, 10161, 10162, 10163, 10164, 10165, 10189, 10221, 10361, 10362, 10365, 10390, 10391, 10414, 10415, 10418, 10420, 10422, 10503, 10507, 10623, 10851, 11097, 11099, 11106, 11112, 11119, 11153, 11491, 11493, 11496, 11510, 13936, 14059, 14062 and 14458 of 2014
Decided On : 24-09-2014
The Court held that the candidates had indulged in mass copying in Pre Medical Tests, 2008 to 2012. The Court also held that the principles of natural justice would have no application in the peculiar fact situation of these cases.
Issues: Whether the candidates had indulged in mass copying in Pre Medical Tests, 2008 to 2012. Whether the principles of natural justice would have any application in the peculiar fact situation of these cases.
Judgment:
Alok Aradhe, J.
1. In this batch of writ petitions, the petitioners have, inter alia, assailed the validity of the orders dated 24-4-2014, 3-5-2014, 6-5-2014, 7-5-2014, 8-5-2014 and 19-5-2014 by which, the Professional Examination Board (hereinafter referred to as "the Board") has cancelled the results of the petitioners on the ground that the petitioners had resorted to unfair means during the Pre Medical Tests held between years 2008 to 2012. The petitioners also seek consequential direction to the respondents to permit them to prosecute the studies in MBBS Course. In order to appreciate the petitioners' challenge to the impugned orders, the relevant facts need mention, which are stated infra. The Board was initially constituted by Notification dated 30-7-1983 and thereafter, re-constituted by Notification dated 22-1-2004 in exercise of executive powers by the State Government for discharging its obligation of conducting free and fair pre-entrance examination for admission to professional courses. The Board has been conducting Pre Medical Tests every year for admission to MBBS Course in respect of various Colleges in the State of Madhya Pradesh. The Board held the Pre Medical Tests between the period from 2008 to 2013. The Pre Medical Test, 2013 was scheduled to be held on 7-7-2013. A complaint regarding commission of gross irregularities and use of unfair means by the candidates in the examination was received by the Director General of Police on 6-7-2013. Acting on the said complaint and reports published in local newspapers about the conspiracy hatched for resorting to unfair means by a large number of candidates with the assistance of the candidates coming from other States, the Indore Crime Branch arrested about 20 suspects.
2. On 7-7-2013, First Information Report was lodged bearing Crime No. 539/2013 at Police Station, Rajendra Nagar, Indore mentioning about involvement of large number of candidates having indulged in unfair means during Pre Medical Test, 2013. After registration of First Information Report, the Crime Branch made enquiries and sought certain information from the officials of the Board, which was furnished to the Crime Branch on 12-7-2013. The officials of the Board, namely, Nitin Mohindra, Principal System Analyst and Ajay Kumar Sen, Senior System Analyst were interrogated and were arrested by the Police on 16-7-2013 and were suspended by the Board on 17-7-2013. During the investigation, involvement of one C.K. Mishra, Assistant Programmer of the Board was also found. The Board received a list of 317 candidates from Superintendent of Police, Indore, who were named as beneficiaries of the conspiracy. The factum of involvement of one Jagdish Sagar in the conspiracy also came to the light. The Director of the Board submitted proposal to the Chairman on 30-8-2013 to permit constitution of Computer Experts Committee to examine the records and submit its opinion and recommendations. The Chairman accorded approval to the said proposal on 5-9-2013.
3. The Director of the Board by communication dated 31-8-2013 required Nitin Mohindra and Ajay Kumar Sen to furnish the logic of allotment of roll numbers for facilitating the scrutiny by the Computer Experts Committee. The said officials by communication dated 3-9-2013 expressed their inability to disclose the logic in allocation of the roll numbers to the candidates. In the absence of information divulged by the aforesaid officials, the Computer Experts Committee had to evolve its own mechanism to find out the methodology adopted in the allocation of roll numbers to the concerned candidates by method other than the stipulated or specified randomisation process. The Computer Experts Committee comprising of 6 experts was constituted, which convened its first meeting on 7-9-2013. The Committee submitted its report on 7-9-2013 in which, in the initial scrutiny, it found mismatch of roll numbers of 30195 out of 40086 candidates including the allocation of roll n
AI
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.