Dinesh Yadav vs State of Madhya Pradesh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(MP) 127

SUJOY PAUL, AMAR NATH KESHARWANI
Dinesh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent

Advocates:
Vishal R. Daniel for appellant;
Ajay Shukla, Government Advocate for respondent No. 1/State.

JUDGMENT

1. This Criminal Appeal is filed under section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) questioning the judgment dated 12.1.2019 passed in SCATR No.07/2013 by learned Special Judge under the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, whereby the appellant was convicted and sentenced as under :--

Convicted under sections	Sentenced to undergo
452 of IPC	R.I. for 5 years with fine of Rs.1000/- and in default R.I. for three months.
342 of IPC R.I.	for 1 year.
376(1) of IPC	R.I. for Life with fine of Rs.2000/- and in default R.I. for six months.
3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act	R.I. for Life with fine of Rs.2000/- and in default R.I. for six months.
3(1)(xii) of SC/ST Act	R.I. for 5 years with fine of Rs.1000/- and in default R.I. for three months.
3(a) r/w 4 of POCSO Act R.I.	for 7 years with fine of Rs.1000/- and in default R.I. for three months.
	All sentences to run concurrently

2. As per the prosecution case, the prosecutrix lodged a written report on 27.12.2012 in Polic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(MP) 127

SUJOY PAUL, AMAR NATH KESHARWANIDinesh Yadav – AppellantVersusState of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent

SUJOY PAUL, AMAR NATH KESHARWANI
Dinesh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent