IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sujoy Paul, Prakash Chandra Gupta, JJ.
Additional Sessions Judge/Special – Appellant
Versus
Ramnath Kewat Alias Bhursoo – Respondent
CRRFC No. 04 of 2019 with Criminal Appeal No. 2754 of 2019
Decided On : 29-07-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prosecution establishes the case against the appellant. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 2. doubts raised on evidence regarding age and dna testing. (Para 24 , 25 , 27 , 32 , 35) |
| 3. witnesses corroborate prosecution's case. (Para 41 , 43 , 44) |
| 4. court analysis supports conviction based on dna evidence and circumstances. (Para 61 , 78 , 82 , 87 , 92) |
| 5. death penalty modified to life imprisonment. (Para 94 , 95) |
JUDGMENT
Sujoy Paul, J. - The Death Reference and Criminal Appeal are arising out of impugned judgment dated 05.03.2019 passed in Case No.400160/2015 whereby appellant was held guilty for committing the offences and sentenced as under :-
| Serial No. | CONVICTION | SENTENCE |
| 1. | Under Section 376 (2) (I) New Section of April 2, 2013 in Criminal Proceeding is Jointly with 5/6 Sexual Offences in Connection with the Child's Crime 376-A of the I.P.C. | Death Sentence to be hanged till death and fine of Rs.200/-(Rs. Two Hundred) Only. In default of payment of fine further R.I. for 01 month. |
| 2. | Under Section 302 of the I.P.C. | Death and fine of Rs.200/-(Rs. Two Hundred Only. In default of Payment of fine further R.I. for 01 month. |
| 3. | Under Section 201 of the I.P.C. | R.I. for seven years and fine of Rs.200/- only. In default of payment of fine further R.I. for 1 month. |
| All sentences shall run concurrently. In the above death sentence it is directed that the appellant be hanged by the neck till his death. | ||
FACTUAL BACKGROUND :-
2. The case of the prosecution before the Court below was that on 09.06.2015 at around 1:30 P.M. in village Jhagraha, Police Station Amlai, District Shahdol, the appellant raped and murdered 12 years old girl in the vacant room of Kailash Kewat and tried to hide her dead body under the paddy straws.
3. To elaborate, on 09.06.2015 the family members of victim were taking rest in their house. The father of victim was sleeping. The younger sister of victim (P.W.3) was watching T.V. with the victim. The victim told her younger sister (P.W.3) that she is going to answer the call of the nature. When she did not return for quite sometime, (P.W.3) came out of the house and found that in the house of Kailash Kewat, there is a vacant room which is opened. Out of curiosity, (P.W.3) went in front of that door and found that appellant is trying to hide. Out of fear, she came back. Thereafter, family members started searching for the victim. During search at around 7:00 P.M., the uncle of deceased (P.W.5) found that the dead body of victim is lying on the floor of a room of Kailash Kewat (P.W.9). The said room was being used to keep paddy straws & chaff. The legs of deceased were covered by using a heap of paddy straws.
4. The father of deceased (P.W.1) received an information on phone from his younger brother (P.W.5) about the dead body of her daughter. He, in turn, lodged the merg intimation. The police reached the scene of crime and prepared a punchnama of the dead body. Thereafter, the post mortem of dead body of the victim was conducted. The relevant educational qualification documents of victim were obtained from her father (P.W.1). During investigation, the statement of (P.W.3) was recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C.
5. A site map was prepared. The undergarments and clothes of victim were recovered. In addition, the plain and blood stained soil were recovered. All the seized materials were sealed and a seizure memo was prepared. The appellant was arrested on 10.6.2015 and on the basis of his statement, from his house a blood stained T-shirt and underwear was recovered. The statement of accused was recorded in a DVD. The medical examination of appellant was conducted and during examination, his semen sample was also taken. The semen of accused, his clothes and blood sample were seized and were sent for examination to the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) and to the DN
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs. State of Maharashtra and 1989 Supp2 SCC 706
State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Shobhanath and Ors
Swamy Shraddananda vs. State of Karnataka
Zahira Habibullah Sheikh vs. State of Gujarat
Amit vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Amit vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Amrit Singh vs. State of Punjab
Anil @ Anthony Arikswamy Joseph vs. State of Maharashtra
Anil Alias Bawa vs. State of Haryana
Arjun Panditrao Khotka vs. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal and Others
Ashwani Kumar Saxena vs. State of M.P
Bachan Singh vs. State of Punjab
Bachan Singh vs. State of Punjab
Bhagwan Das vs. State of Rajasthan (AIR 1957 SC 589 : 1957 Cri LJ 889)
Bheru Singh vs. State of Rajasthan
Dhananjay Chatterjee vs. State of West Bengal
Hanumant Govind Nargundkar vs. State of M.P
Haresh Mohandas Rajput vs. State of Maharashtra
Hemudan Nanbha Gadhvi vs. State of Gujarat
Jagmohan Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Kamti Devi vs. Poshi Ram (2001) 5 SCC 311 : 2001 SCC (Cri) 892 : AIR 2001 SC 2226
Machhi Singh and others vs. State of Punjab
Machhi Singh vs. State of Punjab
Mahila Vinod Kumari v.State of M.P.
Manu Sao vs. State of Bihar (2010) 12 SCC 310 : (2011) 1 SCC (Cri) 370)
Mulla and another vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2010) 9 SCC 747
Namdeo vs. State of Maharashtra
Neel Kumar @ Anil Kumar vs. State of Haryana
Panchhi and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Ram Deo Prasad vs. State of Bihar
Ravi S/o Ashok Ghumare vs. State of Maharashtra
Santosh Kumar Singh vs. State through CBI
Santosh Kumar Singh vs. State through CBI
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on the DNA report to establish the guilt of the appellant under Sections 376(AB), 366, and 324 of the Indian Penal Code. The court als....
Court emphasized the application of circumstantial evidence principles where all links confirmed the appellant's guilt in the kidnapping, sexual assault, and murder of a minor, upholding a death sent....
(1) Evidence is only to be weighed and not to be counted – It is essentially, for prosecution to decide as to how many witnesses are to be examined to establish its case on any particular point.(2) D....
The court emphasized the need for credible evidence in establishing the victim's age in sexual offences and the exceptional nature required to impose death penalties, particularly in cases involving ....
Rape and murder of minor girl –Acquittal under - Execution of crime doubtful - Incident does not appear to have happened in the manner in which the prosecution want the Court to believe it had happen....
though the appellant is guilty of the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC, since there was no requisite intent as would bring the case under any of the first three clauses of Section 300 IPC, th....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.