SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 861

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sujoy Paul, Prakash Chandra Gupta, JJ.
Additional Sessions Judge/Special – Appellant
Versus
Ramnath Kewat Alias Bhursoo – Respondent
CRRFC No. 04 of 2019 with Criminal Appeal No. 2754 of 2019
Decided On : 29-07-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Shri Sanjay Agrawal, Senior Advocate With Shri Anuj Agrawal - Advocate As Amicus Curiae, Shri Abhay Gupta - Advocate, for the Appellant; Shri R.S. Shukla- Advocate As Amicus Curiae. Shri Yogesh Dhande- Government Advocate, for the Respondent

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 376(2)(I), and 201 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Conviction of appellant for rape and murder of minor girl - Convicted sentenced to death which was later reduced to life imprisonment of 35 years without remission by the High Court - Appellant's DNA matched with evidence and the victim was established to be under 12 years of age, an important factor for conviction and sentencing - Appeal partly allowed modifying death penalty. (Paras 1, 20, 87, 94)

(B) Analysis of Evidence - Importance of corroborative evidence and DNA testing in establishing guilt was emphasized - Clear determination of victim’s age based on school records and testimonies established prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. (Paras 18, 54)

(C) Sentencing Principles - The court evaluated aggravating and mitigating circumstances thoroughly, ruling that capital punishment was not suitable in this case as it did not meet the 'rarest of rare' criterion. (Paras 92, 94)

Facts of the case:
Appellant was convicted of raping and murdering a 12-year-old girl, found dead on June 9, 2015. Circumstantial evidence, including DNA, linked him to the crime, establishing the victim's age and the nature of her injuries. (Paras 2, 54)

Findings of Court:
The lower court's conviction was upheld, and the death sentence was commuted due to a balance of aggravating and mitigating factors. The evidence presented by the prosecution sufficiently satisfied the burden of proof required for a conviction. (Paras 94)

Issues: The primary legal questions were whether sufficient evidence was presented to convict the appellant and whether the sentencing was appropriate in light of the circumstances. (Paras 1, 87)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that DNA evidence and school records were decisive in establishing both the crime's occurrence and the victim's age, ruling that the sentencing guidelines require a comprehensive evaluation of the context surrounding the crime. The modification of the death sentence reflects a consideration for mitigating circumstances, including the appellant's lack of prior criminal history and the nature of the crime. (Paras 87, 94)

Result: Death sentence modified to life imprisonment of 35 years without remission. Appeals partly allowed.

Table of Content
1. prosecution establishes the case against the appellant. (Para 2 , 5)
2. doubts raised on evidence regarding age and dna testing. (Para 24 , 25 , 27 , 32 , 35)
3. witnesses corroborate prosecution's case. (Para 41 , 43 , 44)
4. court analysis supports conviction based on dna evidence and circumstances. (Para 61 , 78 , 82 , 87 , 92)
5. death penalty modified to life imprisonment. (Para 94 , 95)

JUDGMENT

Sujoy Paul, J. - The Death Reference and Criminal Appeal are arising out of impugned judgment dated 05.03.2019 passed in Case No.400160/2015 whereby appellant was held guilty for committing the offences and sentenced as under :-

Serial No.

CONVICTION

SENTENCE

1.

Under Section 376 (2) (I) New Section of April 2, 2013 in Criminal Proceeding is Jointly with 5/6 Sexual Offences in Connection with the Child's Crime 376-A of the I.P.C.

Death Sentence to be hanged till death and fine of Rs.200/-(Rs. Two Hundred) Only. In default of payment of fine further R.I. for 01 month.

2.

Under Section 302 of the I.P.C.

Death and fine of Rs.200/-(Rs. Two Hundred Only. In default of Payment of fine further R.I. for 01 month.

3.

Under Section 201 of the I.P.C.

R.I. for seven years and fine of Rs.200/- only. In default of payment of fine further R.I. for 1 month.

All sentences shall run concurrently. In the above death sentence it is directed that the appellant be hanged by the neck till his death.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND :-

2. The case of the prosecution before the Court below was that on 09.06.2015 at around 1:30 P.M. in village Jhagraha, Police Station Amlai, District Shahdol, the appellant raped and murdered 12 years old girl in the vacant room of Kailash Kewat and tried to hide her dead body under the paddy straws.

3. To elaborate, on 09.06.2015 the family members of victim were taking rest in their house. The father of victim was sleeping. The younger sister of victim (P.W.3) was watching T.V. with the victim. The victim told her younger sister (P.W.3) that she is going to answer the call of the nature. When she did not return for quite sometime, (P.W.3) came out of the house and found that in the house of Kailash Kewat, there is a vacant room which is opened. Out of curiosity, (P.W.3) went in front of that door and found that appellant is trying to hide. Out of fear, she came back. Thereafter, family members started searching for the victim. During search at around 7:00 P.M., the uncle of deceased (P.W.5) found that the dead body of victim is lying on the floor of a room of Kailash Kewat (P.W.9). The said room was being used to keep paddy straws & chaff. The legs of deceased were covered by using a heap of paddy straws.

4. The father of deceased (P.W.1) received an information on phone from his younger brother (P.W.5) about the dead body of her daughter. He, in turn, lodged the merg intimation. The police reached the scene of crime and prepared a punchnama of the dead body. Thereafter, the post mortem of dead body of the victim was conducted. The relevant educational qualification documents of victim were obtained from her father (P.W.1). During investigation, the statement of (P.W.3) was recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C.

5. A site map was prepared. The undergarments and clothes of victim were recovered. In addition, the plain and blood stained soil were recovered. All the seized materials were sealed and a seizure memo was prepared. The appellant was arrested on 10.6.2015 and on the basis of his statement, from his house a blood stained T-shirt and underwear was recovered. The statement of accused was recorded in a DVD. The medical examination of appellant was conducted and during examination, his semen sample was also taken. The semen of accused, his clothes and blood sample were seized and were sent for examination to the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) and to the DN

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top