Back
SUJOY PAUL, PRAKASH CHANDRA GUPTA
Additional Sessions Judge/Special – Appellant
Versus
Ramnath Kewat Alias Bhursoo – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prosecution establishes the case against the appellant. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 2. doubts raised on evidence regarding age and dna testing. (Para 24 , 25 , 27 , 32 , 35) |
| 3. witnesses corroborate prosecution's case. (Para 41 , 43 , 44) |
| 4. court analysis supports conviction based on dna evidence and circumstances. (Para 61 , 78 , 82 , 87 , 92) |
| 5. death penalty modified to life imprisonment. (Para 94 , 95) |
JUDGMENT
Sujoy Paul, J. - The Death Reference and Criminal Appeal are arising out of impugned judgment dated 05.03.2019 passed in Case No.400160/2015 whereby appellant was held guilty for committing the offences and sentenced as under :-
| Serial No. | CONVICTION | SENTENCE |
| 1. | Under Section 376 (2) (I) New Section of April 2, 2013 in Criminal Proceeding is Jointly with 5/6 Sexual Offences in Connection with the Child's Crime 376-A of the I.P.C. | Death Sentence to be hanged till death and fine of Rs.200/-(Rs. Two Hundred) Only. In default of payment of fine further R.I. for 01 month. |
| 2. | Under Section 302 of the I.P.C. | Death and fine of Rs.200/-(Rs. Two Hund |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
