IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sujoy Paul, Prakash Chandra Gupta, JJ.
Santosh Markam – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 1579 of 2020 with Criminal Reference No. 01 of 2020
Decided On : 05-09-2022
DNA Report - Criminal Law - Indian Penal Code, Section 376(AB), Section 366, Section 324 - The court relied on the DNA report to establish the guilt of the appellant under Sections 376(AB), 366, and 324 of the Indian Penal Code. The DNA report was considered trustworthy and formed the basis for recording the conviction. The court also examined the handling and safety of the samples, finding no procedural impropriety or illegality in the collection, custody, and sending of the blood samples and other materials to the Forensic Science Laboratory. The court ultimately upheld the finding of the lower court based on the DNA report.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant was found guilty of committing offences under Sections 376(AB), 366, and 324 of the Indian Penal Code based on the prosecution's story of the incident, the DNA report, and the handling of the samples. The victim, a juvenile, was found in a serious condition with injuries consistent with sexual assault. The court considered the statements of witnesses, medical reports, and expert evidence, ultimately relying on the DNA report to establish the guilt of the appellant.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the appellant guilty of committing offences under Sections 376(AB), 366, and 324 of the Indian Penal Code based on the DNA report and other evidence presented. The court also examined the handling and safety of the samples, finding no procedural impropriety or illegality in the collection, custody, and sending of the blood samples and other materials to the Forensic Science Laboratory. The court ultimately upheld the finding of the lower court based on the DNA report.
Issues: The main issue was the guilt of the appellant under Sections 376(AB), 366, and 324 of the Indian Penal Code, which was established based on the DNA report and other evidence presented. The court also examined the handling and safety of the samples, finding no procedural impropriety or illegality in the collection, custody, and sending of the blood samples and other materials to the Forensic Science Laboratory.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the DNA report to establish the guilt of the appellant under Sections 376(AB), 366, and 324 of the Indian Penal Code. The DNA report was considered trustworthy and formed the basis for recording the conviction. The court also examined the handling and safety of the samples, finding no procedural impropriety or illegality in the collection, custody, and sending of the blood samples and other materials to the Forensic Science Laboratory. The court ultimately upheld the finding of the lower court based on the DNA report.
Final Decision: The court found the appellant guilty of committing offences under Sections 376(AB), 366, and 324 of the Indian Penal Code based on the DNA report and other evidence presented. The court also examined the handling and safety of the samples, finding no procedural impropriety or illegality in the collection, custody, and sending of the blood samples and other materials to the Forensic Science Laboratory. The court ultimately upheld the finding of the lower court based on the DNA report.
JUDGMENT
Sujoy Paul, J. - The validity of judgment dated 24/01/2020 passed in S.T.No.22/2019 is under question in this reference and in the criminal appeal filed by the appellant whereby the Court below held the appellant guilty for committing offences under Section 376(AB) of Indian Penal Code and directed to impose death sentence. The appellant was also held guilty for committing offence under Sections 366 and 324 of Indian Penal Code for which he was directed to undergo sentence of 10 years R.I. and 3 years R.I. respectively with default stipulations.
FACTUAL BACKDROP :
2. The parents of the prosecutrix/victim are beggars. They were residing in a vacant place/jail ground near Bus Stand Narsinghpur. The incident had taken place in the intervening night of 24/06/2019 and 25/06/2019. Four days before the incident, certain other relatives of victim also reached the ground where victim and her parents were staying. They were also staying with the family of the victim.
3. As per the prosecution story, on 24/06/2019 at around 10:00 P.M. the parents of victim, the victim and her younger sister went to sleep. At around 2:30 A.M., the mother of victim (PW-3) found that victim is sleeping in her bed. However, again when she awake at around 3:00 A.M. she found that victim is missing from her bed. She raised an alarm and her husband (PW-1) and brother-in-law (PW-26) also came out of their slumber. The parents and relatives searched nearby places but could not find the victim.
4. On 25/06/2019 at about 7:00 A.M., a man on a bicycle approached them and informed that a small girl is lying under a tamarind (Imli) tree.
The parents of victim, brother-in-law (PW-26) and other relatives and neighbour Sarita reached the place and found that under the said tree, the victim (PW-2) is lying. There were marks of bruises on her face and lips.
There was bleeding from her private parts. In 108 ambulance, the victim was taken to District Hospital Narsinghpur where she informed that a man had forcibly taken her, put a piece of cloth in her mouth and sexually assaulted her.
5. In turn, Assistant Sub-Inspector J.N. Gyarsiya (PW-4) received an information from District Hospital Narsinghpur about the said incident and accordingly, Dehati Nalisi (Ex.P/11) was recorded. On the basis of said Dehati Nalisi, offences under Sections 363, 366(A), 376(3), 376(AB), 323 and 324 of Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3(a), 4, 5(i), 5(m), and 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 were registered against the appellant vide Crime No.448/2019.
6. During the investigation, a site map was prepared. From the scene of crime, a blood stained stone, empty water bottle, five half burnt pieces of 'bidi', half burnt match sticks were recovered. On 25/06/2019 itself during the treatment of victim, her frock was recovered and vaginal slide was prepared and handed over to Sub-Inspector J.N. Gyarsiya.
7. Considering the serious condition of victim, she was referred to Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Medical College Hospital, Jabalpur. The statement of witnesses were recorded. During the investigation, CCTV footage of certain roads near jail crossing were obtained. The footage from Camera F-1, F-2, F-3, F-4/PTZ were recovered. Duration of which was between 1:49 to 1:55 AM, 2:42 to 2:45 AM and 4:39 to 4:44 AM. The relevant photographs were prepared based on CCTV footage. The CCTV footage/photographs were shown to various persons. In turn, two cops namely Rajkumar, Constable Driver No.107 and Vikrant Jatt, Gunman SAF Constable No.486 identified the person who was carrying the victim as Santosh Markam, Cook Trade Constable No.1398.
8. On the basis of suspicion, appellant was asked to join investigation and on 27/06/2019, his one full check shirt, Blue full pant, Maroon belt, Blue underwear, White socks and Black shoes were recovered. The appellant was sent for medical examination to District Hospital Narsinghpur. Appellant's semen slide was prepared and his blood samples we
Bachan Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Bhagwan Das v. State of Rajasthan [AIR 1957 SC 589 : 1957 Cri LJ 889
Earabhadrappa v. State of Karnataka [(1983) 2 SCC 330 : 1983 SCC (Cri) 447]
Jaffar Hussain Dastagir v. State of Maharashtra [(1969) 2 SCC 872
K. Chinnaswamy Reddy v. State of A.P. [AIR 1962 SC 1788]
Kamti Devi (Smt.) and another vs. Poshi Ram (2001) 5 SCC 311
Machhi Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab
Mahesh, s/o Ram Narain and others Vs. State of M.P
Mofil Khan and another Vs. State of Jharkhand
Nandlal Wasudeo Badwaik Vs. Lata Nandlal Badwaik and Another
Santa Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Sevaka Perusal and another Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Shamshul Kanwar v. State of U.P. [(1995) 4 SCC 430 : 1995 SCC (Cri) 753]
Shiv Mohan Singh Vs. State (Delhi Admn.) reported in (1977) 2 SCC 238
Shyamal Ghosh v. State of West Bengal (2012) 7 SCC 646
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Jeet Singh
State of Rajasthan v. Bhup Singh [(1997) 10 SCC 675 : 1997 SCC (Cri) 1032
AI
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on the DNA report to establish the guilt of the appellant under Sections 376(AB), 366, and 324 of the Indian Penal Code. The court als....
The prosecution must establish the identity and age of the victim beyond reasonable doubt in sexual offense cases, particularly involving minors, and the evidentiary value of DNA reports is contingen....
DNA evidence requires proper documentation and chain of custody to be admissible; conviction cannot solely rely on such evidence without corroborating proof.
The imposition of the death penalty requires the statutory provision of special reasons, and a balancing of aggravating and mitigating circumstances must be conducted.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, especially when the primary witness turns hostile, and reliance on inconsistent testimony and improperly handled DNA evidence is insufficient....
The court held that the death penalty is inappropriate for a first-time offender without prior convictions; life imprisonment is more suitable given mitigating circumstances.
The victim's testimony suffices for conviction in sexual assault cases, affirming the importance of credible evidence despite procedural flaws in investigation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.