SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 787

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia, J.
Doli Hasija – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.23614 of 2022
Decided On : 10-05-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Ravi Dwivedi, Advocate, Sushant Tiwari, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

The main legal point established in the judgment is the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., balancing the apprehension of arrest with specific conditions to ensure the applicant's compliance.

Headnote:

Anticipatory Bail - Criminal Law - The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant, subject to the condition that she appears before the Investigating Officer by a specified date and complies with other conditions under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. The court also directed that the intimation regarding the grant of bail be sent to the complainant.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant filed for anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in connection with a case registered for offences under Sections 406, 506, and 34 of IPC. The complainant alleged that money was taken for a job in Municipal Corporation, and when demanded back, threats were made by the applicant and her husband.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the application for anticipatory bail, considering the submissions made by the applicant's counsel and without commenting on the merits of the case. The bail was granted subject to specific conditions, including appearance before the Investigating Officer by a specified date.

Issues: The primary issue was the grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant in connection with the alleged offences.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the need to balance the apprehension of arrest with the requirement of the applicant's appearance before the Investigating Officer and compliance with the conditions under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.

Final Decision: The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant, subject to specific conditions, and directed that the intimation regarding the grant of bail be sent to the complainant.

JUDGMENT

Gurpal Singh ahluwalia, J. - Case diary is available.

This first application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail.

The applicant apprehends her arrest in connection with Crime No.117/2022 registered at Police Station Sirol, District Gwalior for offence under Sections 406, 506 and 34 of IPC.

It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that according to the prosecution case, the complainant had given Rs.3,00,000/- to the husband of the applicant for procuring a job in Municipal Corporation, Gwalior. Later on she found that neither any vacancy has been declared nor any applicant form has been submitted. It is alleged that when the complainant demanded her money back, then the applicant and her husband as well as their child threatened that in case if money is demanded, then she would be killed. It is submitted that there is no allegation that the applicant in any manner are an instrumental in giving any false assurance or taking money from the complainant. The only allegation is that when she came to house of the applicant, then she had also threatened her. She is ready and willing to abide by any stringent condition, which may be imposed by this Court. The Trial is likely to take sufficiently long time and there is no possibility of her absconding or tampering with prosecution witnesses.

Per contra, the application is vehemently opposed by the Counsel for the State.

Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the applicant and without commenting on the merits of the case, the application is allowed subject to condition that if the applicant appears before the Investigating Officer (arresting Officer) on or before 17/05/2022 she shall be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting Officer (Investigating Officer).

The applicant shall make herself available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer as and when required. She shall further abide by the other conditions enumerated in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of Cr. P. C.

It is made clear that in case if the applicant fails to appear before the Investigating Officer (arresting authority) on or before 17/05/2022 then this order shall lose its effect and the Investigating Officer shall be at liberty to take her in custody.

In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of aparna Bhat & Ors. vs. State of M.P. passed on 18/3/2021 in Criminal appeal No.329/2021, the intimation regarding grant of bail be sent to the complainant.

Certified copy as per rules.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top