Back
G. S. AHLUWALIA, RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Ahmed Sayeed – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and facts. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments by the defense about witness reliability. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court's observations on evidence and its evaluation. (Para 13 , 19 , 48) |
| 4. medical evidence of deceased individuals. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. discussion on the legal implications of evidence conflicts. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 6. analysis of the common object of unlawful assembly. (Para 46 , 50) |
| 7. final decision and implications. (Para 91 , 92) |
JUDGMENT
G.S. Ahluwalia J. - By this common judgment, the Cr.A. No. 410/2010 and Cr.A. No. 456 of 2010 shall be decided.
2. Cr.A. No. 410 of 2010 has been filed by Appellants Ahmed Sayeed, Samim, Anees and Shakeel against the judgment and sentence dated 13-4-2010 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Sironj, Distt. Vidisha in S.T. No. 15/2004, by which the appellants have been convicted and sentenced for the following offences :
a. Under Section 302 /149 of I.P.C. (On three counts for murder of Fida Mohd., Abdul Azeez and Rabia bi) and sentenced to undergo Life Imprisonment and fine of Rs.1000/- in default 6 months R.I., on three counts ;
b. Under Section 307 /149 of I.P.C. (On three counts for attempting to kill Anwa
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
