IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Subodh Abhyankar, J.
Fareed Ahmed (Dr.) & Others v. Local Complaints Committee Women and Child Development Department & Others Writ Petitions No. 20489 of 2019, 23858 of 2019 and 25127 of 2019 (Indore);
Decided on 8.4.2025
(1) Sexual Harassment at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 -- S. 4 -- finding recorded by Supreme Court in respect of constitution of Internal Complaints Committee -- is binding on High Court -- accordingly held that Internal Complaints Committee was not properly constituted. (2007) 5 SCC 428 followed. 2024 SCC Online SC 3122 discussed. [Paras 19 to 21]
(2) Constitution of India -- Art. 226 -- Sexual Harassment at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 -- Ss. 13 and 18 -- Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Rules, 2013 -- R. 11 -- maintainability of writ petition -- bar of alternative remedy -- challenge to order passed by Local Complaints Committee -- held -- remedy of appeal is very much available to petitioners -- all disputed questions of facts can certainly be raised before appellate authority only -- not a fit case to interfere while exercising extraordinary jurisdiction under Art. 226 of Constitution -- petitions dismissed with liberty to take recourse of remedy of appeal. [Paras 26 to 28]
¼1½ efgykvksa dk dk;ZLFky ij ySafxd mRihM+u ¼fuokj.k çfr"ks/k vkSj çfrrks"k½ vf/kfu;e] 2013 & /kkjk 4 & mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk vkarfjd ifjokn lfefr ds xBu ds laca/k esa vfHkfyf[kr fu"d"kZ & mPp U;k;ky; ds fy, vkc)dj & gS rnuqlkj vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd vkarfjd ifjokn lfefr mfpr ढax ls xfBr ugha FkhA ¼2007½ 5 ,llhlh 428 vuqlfjrA 2024 ,llhlh v‚uykbu ,llh 3122 foosfprA ¼iSjk 19 ls 21½
¼2½ Hkkjr dk lafo/kku & vuqPNsn 226 & efgykvksa dk dk;ZLFky ij ySafxd mRihM+u ¼fuokj.k çfr"ks/k vkSj çfrrks"k½ vf/kfu;e] 2013 & /kkjk 13 rFkk 18 & efgykvksa dk dk;ZLFky ij ySafxd mRihM+u ¼fuokj.k çfr"ks/k vkSj çfrrks"k½ fu;e] 2013 & fu- 11 & fjV ;kfpdk pyus ;ksX; gksuk & vkuqdfYid mipkj dk otZu & LFkkuh; ifjokn lfefr }kjk ikfjr vkns'k ij vk{ksi & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & ;kphx.k dks vihy dk mipkj HkyhHkk¡fr miyC/k gS & fuf'pr gh rF;ksa ds lHkh fookfnr ç'u vihy çkf/kdkjh ds le{k gh mBk, tk ldrs gSa & lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 226 ds v/khu vlk/kkj.k vf/kdkfjrk ç;qä djrs gq, gLr{ksi djus ds fy, mi;qä ekeyk ugha & vihy ds mipkj dk ekxZ viukus dh Lora=rk ds lkFk ;kfpdk,¡ [kkfjtA ¼iSjk 26 ls 28½
ORDER
Heard finally.
1. This order shall also govern the disposal of WP Nos.20489/2019, 23858/2019 and 25127/2019 as all these three petitions have arisen out of the same order passed by the Local Complaints Committee (hereinafter referred to as LCC) dated 17.6.2019, pursuant to a complaint made by respondent No.2 Smt. Durgesh Kuwar regarding her sexual harassment at workplace.
2. In W.P. No.25127/2019, which has been filed by Punjab & Sind Bank, one more order dated 8.7.2019 has also been challenged in which, a fine of Rs.50,000/- has been imposed on the Bank on account of non-formation of Internal Complaint Committee. For the sake of convenience, the facts as narrated in W.P. No.20489/2019 are being taken into consideration.
3. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs :--
1. “A writ of certiorari be issued and the record be called from the Local Complaints Committee and the entire proceedings carried out by Local Complaints Committee be quashed.
2. Appropriate Writ/order/direction be issued to quash/set aside the Report dated 17.6.2019 and its recommendations issued by the Local Complaints Committee.
3. Appropriate Writ/order/direction be issued to dismiss the complaint dated 8.1.2019 filed by Smt. Durgesh Kuwar against the Petitioners before the Local Complaints Committee.
4. Appropriate Writ/order/direction be issued to award the cost of the present Writ Petition.
5. Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit may kindly be granted.”
4. The petitioners are aggrieved by the recommendations made by the Local Complaints Committee (LCC) allegedly constituted under the provisions of Sexual Harassment at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, vide its order dated 17.6.2019. On the basis of the complaint filed by respondent No.2 on 8.1.2019 alleging her sexual harassment on workplace as respondent No.2 happens to be an employee of Punjab & Sind Bank and was posted as Chief Manager at P.Y. Road Branch, Indore.
5. The brief the facts of the case as narrated in this writ petition are as under :--
The present Writ Petition is filed for quashment of the proceedings and Final Report dated 17. 6.2019 (Annexure- P/47) of the Local Complaints Committee constituted under section 6 of the Sexual Harassment at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, issued upon the complaint of the respondent No. 2 i.e. Smt. Durgesh Kuwar, the Chief Manager of P. Y. Road branch, Indore lodged against Mr. Pankaj Dwivedi, the then Zonal Manger of Punjab & Sind Bank, Bhopal as well as upon the complaint lodged by her against the Petitioners alleging, inter alia, that the petitioners did not take any action upon the complaint of the respondent No. 2 in respect of misbehaviour done by her immediate superior officer Mr. Pankaj Dwivedi and in a conspiracy protected him. Local Complaints Committee prepared the impugned Final Report dated 17.6.2019, whereby it declared the Report of ICC dated 26.2.2019 as void ab initio and recorded findings to the extent that Mr. Pankaj Dwivedi is guilty of committing sexual harassment with the respondent No. 2 and the Petitioners are also liable for supporting Mr. Pankaj Dwivedi by not taking any action upon the oral and written complaints of the respondent No. 2 thereby, creating hostile work environment for her and committed humiliating treatment likely to affect her health and safety. The LCC recommended a fine of Rs. 50,000/- for not having Internal Complaints Committee at Indore and constituting ICC at Delhi by declaring the same in violation of the provisions of the Act, 2013. The LCC recommended for immediate posting of the respondent No. 2 as branch manager of Punjab & Sind Bank, P.Y. Road branch, Indore. The LCC further recommended for taking disciplinary action against the Petitioners and Mr. Pankaj Dwivedi as per the Service Rules for the acts of sexual harassment. The LCC
The constitution and conduct of the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act) and the Central ....
Inquiries under the Sexual Harassment Act must be conducted where witnesses reside to ensure fairness, and parties must exhaust appellate remedies before seeking judicial review.
Point of Law : Employment and Service matter - Disciplinary matters - Prohibition of sexual harassment of working women - Jurisdiction - Grievance of petitioner falls within the ambit of “disciplinar....
Judicial review of ICC inquiries under the PoSH Act is limited to ensuring procedural fairness, allowing flexible application of natural justice suited to complaint sensitivity without imposing rigid....
The Central Complaints Committee's findings on sexual harassment claims were upheld, emphasizing the importance of thorough inquiry and the principle of preponderance of probabilities in disciplinary....
The court emphasized that an employer must await the Internal Complaints Committee's recommendation during an inquiry before transferring an employee involved in a sexual harassment complaint, as per....
The court emphasized that procedural safeguards and principles of natural justice must be strictly adhered to in disciplinary inquiries against probationers, including the right to be heard and to cr....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.