IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR
G. S. AHLUWALIA
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Punjab Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for condonation of delay (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. steps to justify delay in filing review (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. respondent's opposition and arguments presented (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. judicial precedents on delay and sufficient cause (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. liberal approach in condonation of delay (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. court's analysis and observations on delay (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. condonation of delay allowed by court (Para 15 , 16) |
| 8. hearing on merits initiated (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
JUDGMENT :
G. S. AHLUWALIA, J.
Heard on I.A. No. 3243/2025, an application for condonation of delay.
2. This review petition has been filed with a delay of 128 days.
3. Paragraphs 2 to 6 of I.A. No. 3243/2025 read as under:-
"(2) That, the order was passed on 18.11.2024 thereafter the authority approaches in the office of Additional Advocate General Gwalior for its legal opinion, which was given on 05.12.2024 dispatched on 06.12.2024. It is not out of place to mention here that as per legal opinion, the Department was required to take permission from the Law Department or from the Advocate General for filing the review petition. The permission from the Forest Department was given to file review on 16.01.2025, bu
Postmaster General v. Living Media India Ltd.
University of Delhi v. Union of India
Inder Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Sheo Raj Singh (deceased) through legal representatives and others vs. Union of India and another
A liberal approach is essential in condoning delays, particularly for government bodies, ensuring that procedural delays do not hinder substantial justice.
Limitation – Condonation of delay being a discretionary power available to courts, exercise of discretion must necessarily depend upon sufficiency of cause shown and degree of acceptability of explan....
The court held that bureaucratic inefficiencies do not constitute sufficient cause for condoning delays in appeals, emphasizing accountability in litigation processes.
The State must provide satisfactory reasons for delay in filing petitions; bureaucratic inefficiency is no excuse. Condonation of delay should not undermine the principles of timely justice.
The law of limitation applies equally to the State and private parties, with bureaucratic inefficiency not sufficient for condoning delay.
(1) Limitation – Condonation of delay – Phrase “within such period” signifies that period covered therein extends to not only original period within which, appeal or application, should have been fil....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.