SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 10

ARINDAM LODH
Puspendu Palit – Appellant
Versus
Tripura State Electricity Corporation Ltd (Tsecl) – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sutapa Deb Barman, Advocate, A Debbarma, Advocate, P Roy Barman, Advocate, Samarjit Bhattacharjee, Advocate, Kawsik Nath, Advocate, A Debbarma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Arindam Lodh, J. - Heard Ms. A. Debbarma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. De, learned Addl. GA appearing for the respondents-State.

2. This is a case of sanctioning of medical reimbursement bill. Issue notice calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why a rule should not be issued as prayed for; and/or as to why such further order or other orders should not be passed as to this court may seem fit and proper.

3. Notice is made returnable on 02.02.2023.

4. Since Mr. De, learned Addl. GA appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondents-State, no formal notice is called for.

5. The petitioner is to take steps for causing service of notice upon the remaining respondents within a period of 3 (three) days by registered post with A/D.

6. List the matter on 02.02.2023.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top