SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Manipur) 38

M. V. MURALIDARAN
Khwairakpam Loken Singh – Appellant
Versus
Rajkumar Imo Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. M. Gunedhor, Advocate, for the Applicant; Mr. Mr. H.S. Paonam, Sr. Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

[1] This application has been filed by the Applicant who is the Election Petitioner of the Election Petition No. 5 of 2017 to call for the documents viz., Serial Nos. 15 to 20 of Schedule II (annexed with M.C. (EP) No. 16 of 2018), from the respective authorities and on receipt of the same, allow the Petitioner to inspect the documents and take certified copies thereof.

[2] After hearing both parties, this Court had already disposed of on 15/01/2021 and thereafter, being aggrieved by the Order dated 15/01/2021 of this Court, the Respondent No. 1 preferred a Civil Appeal No. 804 of 2021 arising out of SLP (C) No. 2743 of 2021 and the Hon’ble Apex Court was pleased to remand back the present matter for consideration afresh with following observation on 03/03/2021:

“If the grievance of the election petitioner is limited to procedural irregularities, production of ballot papers may not be necessary. Hence, the High Court ought to have clarified, albeit briefly, as to how the stated documents are relevant and in what context.

Be that as it may, taking overall view of the matter

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top