SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Manipur) 38

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
M.V. Muralidaran, J.
Khwairakpam Loken Singh - Appellant
Versus
Rajkumar Imo Singh & Ors. - Respondents
MC(EP) No. 19 of 2020, Ref:- El. Petn. No. 5 of 2017
Decided On : 20-09-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mr. M. Gunedhor, Advocate, for the Applicant; Mr. Mr. H.S. Paonam, Sr. Advocate, for the Respondent

Headnote:(A) Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sec. 60 - Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961 - Guidance from Election Commission - Relevant documents pertaining to postal ballot papers called for to assess improper acceptance/rejection - Application to inspect documents allowed to substantiate claims of illegality against electoral officials. (Paras 2, 3, 48-49)

(B) Electoral Process - Right to fair election - Non-compliance with election guidelines and rules can question the legitimacy of election results - Obligations of election officials to adhere to statutory requirements emphasized. (Par. 10)

JUDGMENT

[1] This application has been filed by the Applicant who is the Election Petitioner of the Election Petition No. 5 of 2017 to call for the documents viz., Serial Nos. 15 to 20 of Schedule II (annexed with M.C. (EP) No. 16 of 2018), from the respective authorities and on receipt of the same, allow the Petitioner to inspect the documents and take certified copies thereof.

[2] After hearing both parties, this Court had already disposed of on 15/01/2021 and thereafter, being aggrieved by the Order dated 15/01/2021 of this Court, the Respondent No. 1 preferred a Civil Appeal No. 804 of 2021 arising out of SLP (C) No. 2743 of 2021 and the Hon’ble Apex Court was pleased to remand back the present matter for consideration afresh with following observation on 03/03/2021:

“If the grievance of the election petitioner is limited to procedural irregularities, production of ballot papers may not be necessary. Hence, the High Court ought to have clarified, albeit briefly, as to how the stated documents are relevant and in what context.

Be that as it may, taking overall view of the matter, we deem it appropriate to relegate the parties before the High Court for reconsideration of the request made by the respondents regarding production of documents at Serial Nos. 15 to 20 referred to in paragraph 14 of the impugned Judgment and Order. That question be answered appropriately after analyzing relevant pleadings including the evidence already brought before the Court, in the form of affidavit of evidence.

All contentions available to both sides are left open, to be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law.

The application for production of documents moved by the respondents before the High Court is restored to the file of the High Court to its original number for being considered afresh expeditiously. Order accordingly.

The appeal is disposed of in the above terms”.

[3] This application is taken up for re-hearing as per the Order of the Hon’ble Apex Court.

[4] Heard Mr. Gunedhor the learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. H.S. Paonam, learned Senior counsel for the Respondent No. 1.

[3] Mr. Gunedhor the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that by an order dated 05/03/2020, the Hon’ble Supreme Court was pleased to dispose of SLP being No. 10804/2019 preferred by the Applicant/Election Petitioner. In the said order dated 05/03/2020, the Hon’ble Apex Court was pleased to direct as “the petitioner to approach the High Court in respect of document(s) at serial Nos. 15 to 20 of Schedule II, which application be decided on its own merits afresh by the High Court document-wise, about the relevancy and necessity to produce the same 2 subject to just exceptions.” Accordingly, the Applicant/Election Petitioner filed the present Misc. Case being MC (El. Petn.) No. 19 of 2020 (Ref: Election Petition No. 5 of 2017) praying to call for the documents at Serial Nos. 15 to 20 of Schedule II from the respective authorities and on receipt of the documents allows the Applicant/Election Petitioner to inspect the documents and take certified copies. The documents at Serial Nos. 15 to 20 of Schedule II are as follows:

Sl. No

Particulars of Documents

From whom to be called from

15.

The packets of unused postal Ballot papers with counterfoils attached thereto.

District Election Officer/ Returning Officer of No. 11- Sagolband Legislative Assembly Constituency, Manipur, Imphal West, Pin-795001.

16.

The packets of used Postal Ballot papers whether valid, tendered or rejected

-do-

17.

The packets of the counterfoils of used Postal Ballot papers

-do-

18.

The packets of the marked copy of the electoral roll.

-do-

19.

The packets containing registers of voters in Form 17.

-do-

20.

The packets containing Registers of voters in Form 17 A under Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961 in respect to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top