B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
Madhavi Vuppalapati – Appellant
Versus
Sojitz Corporation The State Of A P hrough its Authorized Rep Mr Yukishisa Mataumoto S/o Mr Hisakichi Atasumto aged 50 yrs Off at 120 Akasaka 6 Chome MinatoKu Tokyo 1078665 Japan – Respondent
ORDER :
CRLP.No.1951 of 2010 is filed by A3, A6, A8 and A12 and CRLP.No.6364 of 2010 is filed A5, A7 and A13 to quash the proceedings in CC.No.140 of 2010 on the file of the IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Miyapur, Ranga Reddy District.
2. The respondent No.1 is the complainant in CC.No.140 of 2010 filed under Section 200 of the Criminal Procedure Code to prosecute the petitioners/accused and the other accused for the offences under Sections 405, 406, 409, 430, 120B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. In the complaint, it is stated by the respondent No.1 that A1 company, its Directors and some of its officers in conspiracy with one another and with a common intention have unlawfully caused financial loss to the complainant company by indulging in acts of cheating and breach of trust and the acts are of such nature, which will have the possible effect of seriously affecting the ability of Hyderabad to attract foreign investments and in particular form Japan.
4. The complainant company is represented through its authorized representatives vide Special Power of Attorney dated 06.08.2010. The complainant company is engaged in the business of international trade and inter alia, pr
Ajoy Kumar Ghose V. State of Jharkhand
Chief Enforcement Officer v. Videocon International Ltd.
Dinesh Chandubhai Patel V. State of Gujarat
Everest Advertising (P) Ltd. v. State, Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Hira Lal Hari Lal Bhagwati v. CBI
Jethsur Surangbhai v. State of Gujarat
Keki Hormusji Gharda v. Mehervan Rustom Irani
Kopisetti Subbharao V. State of A.P.
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. v. Datar Switchgear Ltd.
Maksud Saiyed vs. State of Gujarat & Ors.
N. Rangachari V. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
Pepsi Foods Ltd. v. Special Judicial Magistrate
S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Neeta Bhalla
Saroj Kumar Poddar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Sham Sunder v. State of Haryana
Sharad Kumar Sanghi vs. Sangita Rane
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.