SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 514

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J.  
D. Damodar Reddy - Appellant 
Vs.
State of Telangana - Respondent 
Writ Petition No. 19337 of 2019 
Decided On : 21-03-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : A SURESH
For the Respondent: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION TG

Public recruitment mandates adherence to statutory rules, especially regarding candidate relinquishment, to prevent unfilled vacancies and uphold merit-based appointments.

Headnote:(A) Telangana State Public Service Commission Rules - Rule 6-A - Writ Petition challenging appointment process for School Assistant - TGPSC failed to follow Rule 6-A leading to unfilled vacancies affecting meritorious candidates' rights to appointment. The court emphasized the importance of following statutory rules to prevent unfilled vacancies. (Paras 1, 3, 6, 10, 13)

(B) Legal principle of relinquishment - A selected candidate must willingly relinquish the appointment offer in accordance with Rule 6-A before the next candidate can be considered for the vacancy. (Paras 4, 8)

(C) Judicial guidance - Court must ensure adherence to the statutory provisions to maintain meritocracy in public employment. (Paras 12, 13)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner contends that TGPSC did not call for relinquishments from selected candidates as mandated by Rule 6-A, resulting in vacancies and affecting his opportunity for appointment under Notification No. 52 of 2017.

Findings of Court:
The court found that TGPSC ignored Rule 6-A, thereby preventing the petitioner from being appointed despite his merit, and directed TGPSC to select him based on merit against unclaimed vacancies.

Issues: The primary issue was whether TGPSC's actions disregarding Rule 6-A adversely affected the petitioner's appointment rights.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the failure to follow Rule 6-A is a significant violation affecting merit appointments, reinforcing that statutory regulations must be adhered to in recruitment processes.

Result: Writ Petition allowed, directing appointment based on merit.

Table of Content
1. challenge to tgpsc's appointment process. (Para 1)
2. arguments on application of rule 6(a). (Para 2)
3. overview of the recruitment notifications. (Para 3)
4. judicial decisions impacting tgpsc’s procedures. (Para 4 , 5)
5. supreme court's interpretation of recruitment rules. (Para 6)
6. defense of tgpsc against the writ petition. (Para 7)
7. interpretation of 'fall out vacancies' in recruitment. (Para 8)
8. judicial directive on following recruitment rules. (Para 9)
9. petitioner's claim for unclaimed vacancies. (Para 10)
10. confirmation of petitioner's merit-based claim. (Para 11 , 12)
11. writ petition's basis for allowing relief. (Para 13)
12. court's final directive for appointment. (Para 14 , 15)

ORDER :

Nagesh Bheemapaka, J.

In this Writ Petition, petitioner challenges the action of the Telangana State Public Service Commission (TGPSC) in undertaking appointments to the post of School Assistant (Biological science) under Notification No. 52 of 2017, dated 21.10.2017 without calling for relinquishments from the selected candidates as per mandatory Rule 6-A of the TELANGANA STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION RULES , thereby resulting in unfilled vacancies due to unwillingness of such selected candidates, affecting petitioner’s right to appointment downwards in the merit.

2. According to Sri A. Suresh, learned counsel for petitioner, as per Rule 6(A) of the TELANGANA STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION RULES , if any selected candidate does not take up the offer of appointment, then the same has to be offered to the next meritorious candidate in the order of merit. Admittedly, in the instant case, TGPSC has not followed the said Rule, thereby many of the notified posts are lying vacant, submits learned counsel.

3. The Recruiting Agency - TGPSC issued various Notifications for filling up of vacancies of Trained Graduate Teachers in various subjects, Secondary Grade Teachers in English and Telugu Media, Hostel Welfare Officers in Grade-II in the hostels run for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes, Language Pandits and School Librarians.

The selection process in respect of all the above posts include written examination, certificate verification in the ratio of 1:2 and eventual selection in the ratio of 1:1 for one to get selected to the posts, referred to supra. Though all the Notifications were independently issued by TGPSC and selection process conducted separately, results of the written examination were declared proximately close to one another.

As can be seen from the list of posts for which selection process took place, general educational qualifications required for the posts notified are by and large common, but the hierarchy and the place of work would be one of the crucial factors for the candidates to take a call where they find their names in the list of selected candidates suitable for certificate verification. To elaborate this point a little further, it would be necessary to state that a Trained Graduate Teacher is definitely superior to a Secondary Grade Teacher; similarly, a Librarian in a Junior College is superior to a Librarian in the School. Insofar as Hostel Welfare Officers are concerned, the Hostels run for the Scheduled Tribe candidates in scheduled areas would normally be preferred by candidates belonging to the said group as their possibilities of transfers would be far and few and therefore, a person who is selected both for a BC Hostel and SC Hostel would definitely not prefer to participate in the further process of selection in respect of posts to which they would be given a second preference.

The recruitment procedure is regulated by the TELANGANA STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION RULES . The system of maintenance of wait list is dispensed with and PSC is required to prepare the merit list to the extent of vacancies notified only. For any reason, selected candidates do not join in the post offered to him or after joining the post, he leaves the employment, the said vacancies

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top