Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J
The Management of Manali Petrochemicals Limited – Appellant
Versus
The Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal, Chennai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments from trade unions regarding service conditions (Para 3) |
| 3. counter-arguments from management (Para 4) |
| 4. management's assertions pertaining to industrial peace and financial capacity (Para 6) |
| 5. workmen's counter to management's arguments (Para 7) |
| 6. legal reasoning about individual settlements and their applicability (Para 9) |
| 7. court's analysis on wage revision authority (Para 10) |
| 8. court's reasoning on pension scheme (Para 11) |
| 9. discussion regarding 12(3) settlements (Para 12) |
| 10. final decision on the case outcomes (Para 13) |
COMMON ORDER
These three Writ Petitions are connected and, as such, are taken up and disposed of by this common order.
A. The Factual Matrix:
2. The factual background in which these Writ Petitions arise is that the Government of India set up a petroleum refinery unit, currently known as ‘Chennai Petrochemicals Limited’ at Manali. As a result, several private persons also established related units in and around Manali to make use of available chemicals and by-products and to benefit from Manali's proximity to the port. The petitioner management, namely Manali Petrochemicals Limited, was one such u
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
