S. R. PANDIAN, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE, L. M. SHARMA, K. RAMASWAMY, P. B. SAWANT
Direct Recruit Class Ii Engineering Officers Association – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
The legal document clearly states that principles of Res Judicata and Constructive Res Judicata are applicable to writ petitions. It emphasizes that once a matter has been adjudicated by a competent court and a final judgment has been rendered, the same parties cannot re-litigate the identical issue by merely altering the "form" of their prayer or the procedural approach. This is based on the doctrine that a final judgment on the merits is conclusive and binding, ensuring the stability and consistency of judicial decisions. The principle aims to prevent the abuse of judicial process by avoiding repetitive litigation on the same subject matter and to uphold the finality of judgments.
Judgment
SHARMA, J. : - The perpetual rivalry for seniority in service between the direct recruit and the promotees has once more engaged the attention of this Court for several days. The dispute which was brought to Court by S. B. Patwardhan in 1972 by a writ petition in the Bombay High Court and which was supposed to have been finally settled by the judgment of this Court reported in (1977) 3 SCR 775 has been kept alive by some direct recruits till this date. The events relevant for the case are spread over a long period and the issues joined by the parties have been described in the earlier judgments as involving ticklish and complicated questions of unrivalled complexity with no earlier case comparable. The position as now stands is that the field of controversy on legal questions has been considerably narrowed down by the earlier decisions of this Court, but the relevant facts and the issues to be settled have multiplied by further events and subsequent rules framed under the Proviso to Art. 309 of the Constitution.
2. For appreciating the controversy which has to be resolved, a brief survey of several sets of rules is necessary. The parties are Engineers in the employment of th
V.B. Badami v. State of Mysore
referred to : Paramjit Singh Sandhu v. Ram Rakha
followed : S.B. Patwardhan v. State of Maharashtra
P.Y. Joshi v. State of Maharashtra
distinguished : State of Gujarat v. C.G. Desai
affirmed : S.B. Patwardhan v. State of Maharashtra
Baleshwar Dass v. State of U.P.
Delhi Water Supply and Sewage Disposal Committee v. R.K. Kashyap
commented upon : Narender Chadha v. Union of India
affirmed : S.B. Patwardhan v. State of Maharashtra
relied on : P.C. Sethi v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.