Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
The route must be specified in both the application and the permit, and the route's definition should be consistent with legal provisions to avoid illegal plying or unauthorized operation ["V. NEERAJAKSHAMA NAIDU VS State TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, A. P. BY ITS PRESIDING OFFICER, PUNJAGUTTA, HYDERABAD - Andhra Pradesh"].
Case Law Insights
Analysis and ConclusionThe essential condition for a terminus under the Motor Vehicles Act is that the route must have clearly designated starting and ending points, with the route defined as a line of travel between these termini. The permit and application must specify both termini, and the route must be consistent with the legal definitions and notified schemes. The route's legality hinges on its clear specification of terminal points, ensuring the service operates within the authorized line of travel. Case law supports that the route's definition is fundamental, and a route must be an abstract line of travel between two fixed termini, not just a physical highway or a route without specified endpoints ["V. NEERAJAKSHAMA NAIDU VS State TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, A. P. BY ITS PRESIDING OFFICER, PUNJAGUTTA, HYDERABAD - Andhra Pradesh"], ["EDWIN PERERA v. WEERAKODY"], ["Avdhesh Ranjan Jaiswal, S/o Shri Mukesh Kumar Jaiswal VS State of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh"], ["Viswa Hindu Parishad Kerala Kendra Karyalaya Kaloor v. State of Kerala - Kerala"].
References:- ["V. NEERAJAKSHAMA NAIDU VS State TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, A. P. BY ITS PRESIDING OFFICER, PUNJAGUTTA, HYDERABAD - Andhra Pradesh"]- ["EDWIN PERERA v. WEERAKODY"]- ["Avdhesh Ranjan Jaiswal, S/o Shri Mukesh Kumar Jaiswal VS State of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh"]- ["Viswa Hindu Parishad Kerala Kendra Karyalaya Kaloor v. State of Kerala - Kerala"]
In the bustling world of public transportation in India, bus terminuses—also known as bus stands or halting places—play a crucial role. They serve as hubs for loading, unloading passengers, and maintaining transport vehicles. But what are the essential conditions for a terminus under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (MV Act)? Operators, local authorities, and legal practitioners often ask: What are the essential conditions for a terminus in Motor Vehicles Act, provide case law?
This question touches on regulatory compliance, public safety, and infrastructure approvals. However, a deep dive into available legal documents reveals a notable gap: no direct provisions or case laws explicitly outline 'essential conditions' for establishing or operating a terminus. This post breaks down the findings, related provisions, and recommendations, drawing from analyzed documents while integrating tangential insights from permits, licensing, and transport regulations. Note: This is general information, not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
A 'terminus' typically refers to a designated stopping place for transport vehicles like buses, where they halt for passengers, maintenance, or route endpoints. Under the MV Act, such facilities might fall under Chapter V (Control of Transport Vehicles), particularly Sections 84, 93, or Central Motor Vehicles Rules (CMVR) 278-287, which deal with stands and halting places. Yet, the reviewed documents lack specifics on:
This absence means no statutory 'essential conditions' can be derived directly from the materials. Instead, we turn to related topics like permits and fitness certificates, which indirectly influence terminus operations. Ramankutty VS Pareed Pillai - 2015 0 Supreme(Ker) 1575United India Insurance Company Ltd. VS Vinod - 2019 0 Supreme(MP) 503
The primary legal materials focus on unrelated MV Act aspects:- Driving licenses: Distinctions between Light Motor Vehicles (LMV) and transport vehicles. Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Rambha Devi - 2024 8 Supreme 577- Fitness certificates: Mandatory under Section 56 for permitted vehicles. United India Insurance Company Ltd. VS Vinod - 2019 0 Supreme(MP) 503- Permits: General conditions under Section 66 and 86, emphasizing roadworthiness. For instance, no owner of a motor vehicle shall use or permit the use of the vehicle as a transport vehicle in any public place... save in accordance with the conditions of a permit. United India Insurance Company Ltd. VS Vinod - 2019 0 Supreme(MP) 503- Insurance and claims: Defenses under Section 149, accident compensation. Mukund Dewangan VS Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. etc. - 2016 2 Supreme 135Branch Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. , Branch Office, Nethaji Bye Pass Road, Dharmapuri Town VS Nagammal & Others - 2008 0 Supreme(Mad) 4747Rita Devi VS New India Assurance Co. LTD. - 2000 3 Supreme 698
None address terminus infrastructure. Section 84(a) mentions valid fitness certificates for permitted vehicles, but this relates to vehicles, not stands. United India Insurance Company Ltd. VS Vinod - 2019 0 Supreme(MP) 503
While documents don't cover it, the MV Act generally references:- Section 93: Power to restrict use of vehicles in specified areas or prohibit use of certain stands.- Section 84(g): Permit conditions may include route restrictions or halting places.- CMVR Rules 278-280: Guidelines for public service vehicle stands.
However, without document support, these remain unanalyzed here. Documents confirm no linkage to terminus approvals. Ramankutty VS Pareed Pillai - 2015 0 Supreme(Ker) 1575
Though no cases directly tackle terminus conditions, several touch on permits, licensing, and transport operations, offering contextual value:
In an early case under the Motor Car Ordinance (pre-MV Act precursor), the Tribunal considered factors for issuing route licenses, including under Section 4(6)(a). It states: Under section 4 (6) (a) of the Ordinance of 1938 it is the duty of the Tribunal, if a question of law is involved, to state a case accordingly. PERADENIYA SERVICE BUS CO. LTD. v. SRI LANKA OMNIBUS CO. LTD. This highlights licensing scrutiny but not terminus specifics.
Permit conditions stress public safety: vehicles must carry valid fitness certificates. United India Insurance Company Ltd. VS Vinod - 2019 0 Supreme(MP) 503 Traffic controls under Article 21 require fitness and speed governors, excluding terminus details. M. C. Mehta VS Union Of India - 1997 10 Supreme 17Saji K. M. VS Deputy Transport Commissioner, Central Zone -1, Thrissur - 2019 0 Supreme(Ker) 380
A tender case clarifies: For deciding a question as to whether a particular condition is an essential condition or non-essential condition, we are bound by the law as laid done by the Apex Court... the condition cannot be said to be essential in nature so as to oust the tenderer. Khare and Tarkunde Infrastructure Private Limited VS State of Maharashtra - 2014 Supreme(Bom) 2253 Applied analogously, terminus approvals might distinguish essential (e.g., safety) from non-essential conditions, but no MV Act application here.
Numerous cases involve MV Act claims:- Interim stays in appeals require depositing award amounts. E.g., Appellant shall deposit entire award amount along with interest... If the appellant fails to comply with the condition, the stay granted shall stand automatically vacated. THE BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs ELANGOVANTHE DIVISIONAL MANAGER vs SULOCHANACHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD vs VARALAKSHMI- Compensation under Section 166, maintainable despite ESI Act Section 53. The bar under section 53 of the ESI Act does not apply unless it is established that the injury was an employment injury... Iffco-Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Asha MishraNational Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Hamida Khatoon - 2009 6 Supreme 663
These underscore permit/insurance compliance for transport vehicles using terminuses, but not establishment conditions.
Courts affirm: The general law of tort or special law in Motor Vehicles Act or Workmen’s Compensation Act may provide a remedy for damages... coverage of insurance under the Act... is in addition to but not in substitution. Ruma Raha Roy VS United India Insurance Company Ltd. - 2018 Supreme(Cal) 968New India Assurance Co. Ltd. VS Bidami - 2009 Supreme(Raj) 959 This doesn't directly aid terminus queries but shows layered regulations.
Given the information gap:- Consult Primary Sources: Review MV Act Sections 84(g), 93; CMVR Rules 278-287 for stands/termini.- Seek RTA Approvals: Notified schemes govern terminus notifications.- Ensure Vehicle Compliance: Fitness, permits mandatory for operations. Ramankutty VS Pareed Pillai - 2015 0 Supreme(Ker) 1575- Local Bylaws: Municipal rules may impose additional conditions.
Bullet-point checklist for general compliance:- Valid transport permit (Section 66). United India Insurance Company Ltd. VS Vinod - 2019 0 Supreme(MP) 503- Fitness certificate (Section 56). United India Insurance Company Ltd. VS Vinod - 2019 0 Supreme(MP) 503- Insurance coverage. Mukund Dewangan VS Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. etc. - 2016 2 Supreme 135- Adhere to route/halting restrictions.
The essential conditions for a terminus under the MV Act remain undefined in reviewed documents—no case laws or provisions specify requirements. Related areas like permits and fitness provide indirect guidance, emphasizing safety and authorization. Ramankutty VS Pareed Pillai - 2015 0 Supreme(Ker) 1575United India Insurance Company Ltd. VS Vinod - 2019 0 Supreme(MP) 503
Key Takeaways:- No direct terminus regulations found; focus on vehicle permits.- Courts prioritize essential vs. non-essential conditions in analogous contexts. Khare and Tarkunde Infrastructure Private Limited VS State of Maharashtra - 2014 Supreme(Bom) 2253- Always verify with RTAs and original statutes.
For transport businesses, this highlights the need for proactive compliance research. Stay updated on MV Act amendments, and consider expert consultation to avoid regulatory pitfalls.
Disclaimer: This article synthesizes available materials for informational purposes. Laws evolve; professional advice is essential.
#MotorVehiclesAct #BusTerminus #LegalInsights
No. 1504, Home, dated 17th November, 1973 the state Government published the approved scheme under Section 68-D of the Motor Vechiles Act in respect of the intra-state notified route tirupathi to Clittoor . ... In that case the question was whether an application for variation of a route must be treated as an application for grant of a new permit under Section 57 (8) of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988. In our opinion that decision is of no relevance for the decision of this cas....
Application No. 28-Case stated under section 4 of the Motor Car Ordinance, No. 45 of 1938 Omnibus Service Licensing Ordinance, No. 47 of 1942, ss. 4, 6, 7-Motor Car Ordinance, No. 45 of 1938, s. 4 (6) (a) (b)-Issue of route licence-Factors to be considered- Case stated-May be sent ... Under section 4 (6) (a) of the Ordinance of 1938 it is the duty of the Tribunal, if a question of law is involved, to state a case accordingly. The Ordinance of 1942 amended this provision by exten....
Only you should road-test the vechiles and trade plate must be used. In case the trade certificate is otherwise engaged only on those occasions and if road testing is absolutely essential you may take out the vehicle for trial for a short run with utmost caution. ... 4. ... in this case. ... This obliges me to consider the question as to whether the second respondent committed any error of law when he adjudicated that the petitioner comes with in the exemption under S. 2(s)(iv) of the Act#HL_E....
Vechiles Act, 1988 against the decree and judgment dated 17th ... If the appellant fails to comply with the condition, the stay granted shall stand automatically vacated without any further Appellant shall deposit entire award amount along with interest to February 2020 passed in M.C.O.P.No.71 of 2017, by the Honble Motor the credit of MCOP No.71 of 2017 on the file of the Motor Accident
Vechiles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.02.2020 in MCOP NO.135 of 2015 on the file of the Motor Accidents Appellant shall deposit entire award amount along with interest as on comply with the condition, the stay granted shall stand today to the credit of MCOP No.135 of 2015 on the file of the Motor Judgment and Decree dated 10.02.2020 in MCOP No.135 of 2015 on the file of Motor
The route is an essential ingredient of a permit authorising the plying of motor vehicles on a public highway It is an-abstract concept of line of travel between one terminus and another and is not the same thing as a physical tract between two termii. ... Act'). ... There can be no manner of doubt that a route has two terminals and further as required under the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, the route must be set out not only in the application form but also in the permit itsel....
Vechiles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and Decree dated 20.02.2020 in MCOP No.480 of 2018 on the file of the Motor Accident is a clear violation of policy condition. ... Considering the above circumstances, there shall be an order of interim stay on condition that the Appellant shall deposit the 50% appellant fails to comply with the condition, the stay granted shall Judgment and Decree dated 20.02.2020 in MCOP No.480 of 2018 on the file of Motor
BABU 4 SAMINATHAN 5 S.KALA The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal Under Section 173 of the Motor Vechiles Act, 1988 against the judgment ... The learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that it is a case of fatal accident. ... If the appellant fails to comply with the condition, the stay granted shall stand automatically vacated without any further reference to this Court. Post on 25.01.2021. ... the file of the....
The Full Bench disagreed with the statement of law made by an earlier Division Bench that the essential condition for holding that a motor vehicle was plying as a stage carriage is that it should have picked up passengers en route. ... It is true that in that case the learned Judges observed that "The essential condition for holding that a motor vehicle was plying as a stage carriage is that it should have picked up passengers or set down passengers ....
Vs 1 SENTHIL KUMAR [ RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS ] 2 VIJAY The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal Under Section 173 of the Motor Vechiles Act, 1988 against ... Accordingly, there shall be an order of interim stay as prayed for in CMP.No.15260 of 2021 on condition that the Appellant deposits 50% of the amount apportioned on the Appellant to the credit of MCOP.No.163 of 2017 on ... TO 1 THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL,....
The general law of tort or special law in Motor Vehicles Act or Workmen’s Compensation Act may provide a remedy for damages. In K. Bharathi Devi v. G.I.C.I, AIR 1988 A.P. 361, the contention that the deceased contracted life insurance and due to death in air accident the appellant received compensation and the same would be set off and no double advantage of damages under carriage by Air Act be given was negatived. The next contention that the Motor Vehicles Act provides the remedy for damages for an accident resulting in death of an injured person and that, therefore, the ....
“The next contention that the Motor Vehicles Act provides the remedy for damages for an accident resulting in death of an injured person and that, therefore, the remedy under the Act cannot be availed of lacks force or substance. The general law of tort or special law in Motor Vehicles Act or Workmen's Compensation Act may provide a remedy for damages. The coverage of insurance under the Act in an insured employment is in addition to but not in substitution of the above remedies and cannot on that account be denied to the employee. In Kandimallan Bharathi Devi v. General In....
For deciding a question as to whether a particular condition is an essential condition or non-essential condition, we are bound by the law as laid done by the Apex Court. Applying the law which is consistently followed by the Apex Court in the case of M/s. G.J. Fernandez, Poddar Steel Corporation and in the latest judgment in the case of Rashmi Metaliks Ltd., we find that the condition cannot be said to be essential in nature so as to oust the tenderer. With great respect we cannot construe a condition to be an essential or non-essential, as is understood by "A" party or "B....
“Para 44 : The next contention that the Motor Vehicles Act provides the remedy for damages for an accident resulting in death of an injured person and that, therefore, the remedy under the Act cannot be availed of lacks force or substance. The coverage of insurance under the Act in an insured employment is in addition to but not in substitution of the above remedies and cannot on that account be denied to the employee. The general law of tort or special law in Motor Vehicles Act or Workmen's Compensation Act may provide a remedy for damages.
The next contention that the Motor Vehicles Act provides the remedy for damages for an accident resulting in death of an injured person and that, therefore, the remedy under the Act cannot be availed of lacks force or substance. The general law of tort or special law in Motor Vehicles Act or Workmen’s Compensation Act may provide a remedy for damages. The coverage of insurance under the Act in an insured employment is in addition to but not in substitution of the above remedies and cannot on that account be denied to the employee. In K. Bharathi Dev v. G.I.C.I [AIR 1988 AP ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
