Specific Performance of Contract: Avoiding Execution of Revenue Decree
Discretion and Conditions for Specific Performance Courts exercise discretion when granting specific performance, requiring the plaintiff to prove that there was a valid enforceable contract and that they have consistently been ready and willing to perform their contractual obligations. Failure to prove readiness and willingness, or to establish the existence of a valid contract, results in dismissal of the claim. This is emphasized in multiple sources, notably ["
Parshotam Singh VS Amarjeet Singh - Current Civil Cases
"], ["2024 0 Supreme(Chh) 575"].Legal Provisions and Limitations Under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, a person who fails to aver or prove their readiness and willingness cannot seek specific performance. Section 12 of the Act also restricts courts from directing specific performance of part of a contract, generally favoring the entire contract. These provisions serve as safeguards against unwarranted enforcement, as discussed in ["
Parshotam Singh VS Amarjeet Singh - Current Civil Cases
"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9829"].Scope of Decree and Rescission A decree for specific performance declares the existence of a contract and orders its enforcement, with the court granting all necessary powers to effectuate the decree (["2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 880"]). In certain circumstances, courts may extend time for compliance or rescind the contract if conditions are met, especially concerning immovable property (["2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 880"]).
Discretion and Substantial Acts Courts may exercise discretion to grant specific performance where the plaintiff has undertaken substantial acts or suffered losses due to the contract (["2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2239"]). The discretion is not arbitrary, and courts balance equities, emphasizing the importance of the plaintiff’s ongoing willingness and performance.
Legal Barriers and Inadequate Proof Specific performance cannot be granted if the contract was not properly executed, or if the plaintiff fails to prove their readiness and willingness, as seen in cases where agreements are conditional or require prior permissions (e.g., sale of land needing government approval) (["2025 0 Supreme(Chh) 98"], ["2021 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 2629"], ["2025 0 Supreme(Kar) 958"]).
Impact of Decree and Subsequent Proceedings Once a decree for specific performance is passed, it remains effective and subsists; the court retains control to enforce or modify it. Multiple suits based on the same cause of action are barred under Order II Rule 2 of CPC, preventing multiplicity (["2025 0 Supreme(Kar) 958"], ["2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 491"]).
Summary and Conclusion The main insight is that specific performance of a contract is a discretionary remedy that requires the plaintiff to prove a valid contract and their continuous readiness and willingness to perform. Courts are cautious and will avoid enforcement if these conditions are not satisfied, especially to prevent unjust enrichment or enforcement of unenforceable agreements. The execution of revenue decrees generally does not automatically avoid the grant of specific performance unless legal requirements are unmet. Therefore, specific performance cannot be enforced if the plaintiff fails to establish these essential conditions, and courts will exercise their discretion accordingly (["
Parshotam Singh VS Amarjeet Singh - Current Civil Cases
"], ["2024 0 Supreme(Chh) 575"], ["2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 880"]).
References:- ["
Parshotam Singh VS Amarjeet Singh - Current Civil Cases
"]- ["2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9829"]- ["2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 880"]- ["2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2239"]- ["2025 0 Supreme(Chh) 98"]- ["2023 0 Supreme(Chh) 477"]- ["2021 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 2629"]- ["2025 0 Supreme(Kar) 958"]- ["2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 491"]- ["2024 0 Supreme(Chh) 575"]