Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
The courts have also condemned the practice of imposing excessively onerous conditions, such as large costs or long delays, and have emphasized that setting aside ex parte decrees should not be subject to unjust conditions ["Baskaran vs M/s.Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. - Madras"] ["RANGAMMAL vs NANJAMMAL - Madras"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["K. Rangasamy Gounder VS Muthusamy Gounder & Others - Madras"]- ["RANGAMMAL vs NANJAMMAL - Madras"]- ["K. R. Mani VS P. Kumar - Madras"]- ["Baskaran vs M/s.Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. - Madras"]- ["S.Baharathkanna vs G.Ashwini @ Preethi - Madras"]- ["RANGAMMAL vs NANJAMMAL - Madras"]- ["RANGAMMAL vs NANJAMMAL - Madras"]- ["RANGAMMAL vs NANJAMMAL - Madras"]- ["SMT. VENKATAMMA, D/O. MUNIYAPPA, W/O. LATE SHAMBAIAH vs SRI. T. MUNIYAPPA S/O. LATE THIMMARAYAPPA, DEAD BY LR'S by NIRMALA DEVI - Karnataka"]- ["K.R.MANI vs P.KUMAR - Madras"]- ["KUPPA GOUNDER vs LAKSHMI - Madras"]- ["S. S. Iyyappan VS J. P. Balasubramanian - Madras"]
Imagine this: You've successfully petitioned to set aside an ex parte decree, but the court imposed costs as a condition. Life happens—illness strikes, or unforeseen circumstances delay payment. Now, the question arises: Petition to set aside ex parte decree allowed on terms cost; petitioner filed petition to enlarge time for paying cost; whether allowable?
In Indian civil procedure, the answer is generally yes, provided you demonstrate sufficient cause. This blog explores the legal framework under the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), key judicial precedents, and practical insights to help you navigate this scenario. Note: This is general information, not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
An ex parte decree is passed when the defendant fails to appear, often due to improper service or other sufficient causes (Order IX, Rule 13 CPC) Shyam Kumar Gupta VS Shubham Jain - 2023 2 Supreme 552. Courts can set aside such decrees on terms, like payment of costs, to balance justice for both parties Raj Kumar Soni VS Mohan Meakin Breweries Ltd. - 1979 0 Supreme(All) 227.
These terms ensure the plaintiff is compensated for delays, but they must be reasonable—not onerous Shajudhen P. P. VS N. K. Ashraf - 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 289. For instance, in cases where defendants show genuine reasons for non-appearance, courts impose costs but allow compliance within a fixed period.
Once the petition to set aside is allowed on terms (e.g., pay Rs. X within Y days), what if you can't comply on time? Courts have inherent powers under Section 148 CPC to extend any period fixed for performing an act, even after expiry, if sufficient cause is shown RAMANATH MISHRA VS GANESWAR MISHRA - 1985 0 Supreme(Ori) 145.
Section 151 CPC further empowers courts to make orders necessary for ends of justice, including extending time for costs Pattabi VS Jayammal - 2012 Supreme(Mad) 2722. As held: The point for consideration is as to whether time could be extended for paying the cost imposed by the lower court in getting the exparte decree set aside? The court affirmed this power, directing payment with enhanced costs for delay Pattabi VS Jayammal - 2012 Supreme(Mad) 2722.
Key requirements:- Sufficient cause: Illness, inadvertence, poverty, or unavoidable circumstances Shajudhen P. P. VS N. K. Ashraf - 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 289M. K. Prasad VS P. Arumugam - 2001 5 Supreme 420.- Due diligence: Act promptly upon realizing the delay GMG ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES VS ISSA GREEN POWER SOLUTION - 2015 4 Supreme 508.- Bona fide reasons: Supported by affidavits or evidence; mere neglect won't suffice.
Indian courts have consistently upheld this discretion:
From additional cases:- In a Kerala High Court matter, poverty prevented timely cost deposit after setting aside an ex parte order. The court invoked natural justice and Section 151 CPC, granting another chance: A court must ensure fair opportunities... particularly when reasons like poverty impede compliance T.K.JACOB Vs FAMILY INN OFFICE REPRESENTED BY ITS - 2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 31887.- Another ruling explicitly states: The court has the power to extend the time to pay the cost under Section 151, setting aside a lower court's refusal Pattabi VS Jayammal - 2012 Supreme(Mad) 2722.
These precedents show courts exercise vigilance but prioritize justice over rigid timelines RAMANATH MISHRA VS GANESWAR MISHRA - 1985 0 Supreme(Ori) 145.
Consider a scenario mirroring the query: Petitioners set aside an ex parte order on cost payment condition, but delayed due to notification issues. Courts allowed enlargement upon proof RANGAMMAL vs NANJAMMAL.
In family court proceedings, an ex parte decree was set aside on depositing costs and part decretal amount; extensions were implicitly considered viable THANKAMANIYAMMA vs MINIKUMARY - 2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 40434. Even in revision petitions, delays in setting aside ex parte orders (e.g., 204 days) were condoned with costs, reinforcing flexibility RATHISH KUMAR vs ABRAHAM P J.
Conversely, in cases like repeated failures without valid cause, courts dismiss MANICKAYEE Vs SUBRAMANI. This underscores: Evidence matters.
Extensions aren't automatic. Courts reject if:- Reasons are frivolous or unsupported Shajudhen P. P. VS N. K. Ashraf - 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 289.- Applicant lacks diligence (e.g., long unexplained delays) Ramon Services Private LTD. VS Subhash Kapoor - 2000 7 Supreme 569.- Conditions were already excessive, warranting modification Raj Kumar Soni VS Mohan Meakin Breweries Ltd. - 1979 0 Supreme(All) 227.
The discretion must be judicious, avoiding prejudice to the other party. Poverty, as in the Kerala case, can qualify as sufficient cause, but needs verification T.K.JACOB Vs FAMILY INN OFFICE REPRESENTED BY ITS - 2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 31887.
If facing this issue:1. File promptly: Submit IA under Section 148/151 CPC with affidavit detailing reasons (e.g., medical certificates for illness).2. Offer enhanced costs: Show good faith by proposing additional payments Pattabi VS Jayammal - 2012 Supreme(Mad) 2722.3. Gather evidence: Counsel affidavits or documents strengthen claims M. K. Prasad VS P. Arumugam - 2001 5 Supreme 420.4. Argue justice: Emphasize how denial would cause irreparable harm.
Courts should balance: Impose reasonable terms, scrutinize delays, and ensure fairness RAMANATH MISHRA VS GANESWAR MISHRA - 1985 0 Supreme(Ori) 145.
A petition to enlarge time for paying costs after setting aside an ex parte decree is generally allowable under Sections 148 and 151 CPC, if sufficient cause like illness, poverty, or bona fides is proven Shajudhen P. P. VS N. K. Ashraf - 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 289RAMANATH MISHRA VS GANESWAR MISHRA - 1985 0 Supreme(Ori) 145. Precedents affirm courts' wide discretion to prevent procedural technicalities from defeating justice Shyam Kumar Gupta VS Shubham Jain - 2023 2 Supreme 552.
Key Takeaways:- Demonstrate genuine cause with evidence.- Act without undue delay.- Conditions must be reasonable.
This framework promotes access to justice. For tailored advice, consult a legal expert. Stay informed on CPC applications to safeguard your rights.
References:- RAMANATH MISHRA VS GANESWAR MISHRA - 1985 0 Supreme(Ori) 145: Section 148 powers.- Shajudhen P. P. VS N. K. Ashraf - 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 289: Reasonable terms, bona fides.- Pattabi VS Jayammal - 2012 Supreme(Mad) 2722: Direct on extending time for ex parte costs.- T.K.JACOB Vs FAMILY INN OFFICE REPRESENTED BY ITS - 2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 31887: Poverty as sufficient cause.
Word count: ~950. General info only—seek professional counsel.
#ExParteDecree #CPCExtension #LegalIndia
... 8.I.A.No.658/2002 was filed to set aside the exparte decree passed on 24.6.2002. For non compliance of the conditional order by paying the cost, the application was dismissed on 22.10.2002. ... To set aside the exparte Decree, the Defendants have filed I.A.No.658/2002. That application was allowed on condition of payment of cost of Rs.5000/- on or before 21.10.2002. The appli....
The petitioners were given a reason stating that, though the petitioner/7th defendant in the suit is taking care of the case and the order of the Court for paying the cost was informed to him. The petitioner filed an application to set aside the exparte order. ... The said application was allowed on condition that the petitioners should pay the cost in the order of set aside the....
The petitioner is aggrieved by the onerous condition directing the payment of Rs.2,00,000/- as costs for allowing an application to set aside an exparte order passed in E.P.No.151 of 2021. 3. ... . … Respondent Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the docket order in E.A.No.2 of 2023 in E.P.No.151 of 2021 on the file of the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, at Ponneri, Thiruvall....
Revision Petitioner has produced D.D. for Rs. 5,000/- in the name of the respondent, as directed. In the result, the revision petition is allowed. The Order passed by the District Forum, by which the revision petitioner/opposite party is set ex-parte, is set aside. ... Opposite parties have filed I.A 09/2018 for condoning the delay of 204 days in filing the application to set aside the ex-parte order and I.A 1....
The suit was decreed exparte on 30.06.2014. IA.No.688 of 2014 to set aside the exparte decree was allowed on condition. The date of said conditional order is not known. The condition to set aside the exparte order was that the cost of Rs.250/- should be paid on or before 07.01.2015. ... The suit was filed for recovery of money with interest. The suit was decreed exparte on 30.06.2014. The Defendan....
The suit was decreed exparte on 30.06.2014. The Defendant has filed IA.No.688 of 2014 to set aside the exparte decree and the said IA was allowed on payment of cost of Rs.250/- to the Plaintiff on or before 07.01.2015. ... The suit was decreed exparte on 30.06.2014. IA.No.688 of 2014 to set aside the exparte decree was allowed on condition. The date of said conditional order is ....
2.The said I.A.No.1239 of 2018 in O.S.No.296 of 2012 was filed by the respondent herein to set aside the exparte order and the same was allowed with a cost of Rs.250/-. ... Further, the application in I.A.No.1239 of 2018 in O.S.No.296 of 2012 was filed to set aside the exparte order dated 06.07.2019. The said application was also allowed on payment of Rs.250/-. ... Previously the....
The trial court was not pleased to grant time. The petition was dismissed by Ext.P3 for the reason that the cost was not paid in time. Thereafter, the suit was decreed exparte. Seeking an order to set aside the decree, petitioner filed Ext.P4 petition as IA.No.2304/2002. ... In the result, this writ petition is allowed. Ext.P6 judgment is set aside#HL_....
The point for consideration is as to whether time could be extended for paying the cost imposed by the lower court in getting the exparte decree set aside? ... 7. ... The learned counsel for the revision petitioner/defendant would submit that the court has already made up its mind to condone the delay and also to set aside the exparte decree. The cost imposed for condoning the delay was paid. ......
On 05.10.2018 the Family Court allowed the petition to condone the delay and the petition to set aside the ex parte decree was allowed on condition of paying cost of Rs.10,000/- to the respondent and also deposit of Rs.60,000/- out of the decreetal amount. ... On going through the impugned order itself, it could be seen that only one of the respondents filed the petition to set aside#HL_....
The petition is allowed in the above terms, with no order as to cost.
The petition is allowed in the above terms, with no order as to cost.
The petition is allowed in the above terms and with no order as to cost.
D. Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Honble Court deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner. E. Writ petition filed by the petitioner may kindly be allowed with cost."
The petition is allowed in the above terms and with no order as to cost.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
