Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Legal Principle of Protection of Rights and Marriage Validity: In Lata Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh ["Gurmeet Kaur VS State of Uttarakhand - Uttarakhand"], the Supreme Court emphasized that individuals have the right to marry according to their choice and that the State is duty-bound to protect their lives, liberty, and well-being. The Court reminded law enforcement authorities to comply with these mandates and ensure protection for individuals exercising their rights, especially in cases involving marriage disputes or threats. It also underscored that courts and authorities must uphold constitutional rights against coercion or interference.
Protection Against Coercion and Violence: The case reaffirmed that the State's responsibility includes safeguarding individuals from violence or coercion related to personal relationships, including marriage. The Court directed police authorities to ensure compliance with law and to protect individuals' rights, especially when marriage is conducted as per personal choice and religious rites ["Gurmeet Kaur VS State of Uttarakhand - Uttarakhand"].
Marital Disputes and Transfer of Cases: Several cases involve transfer petitions concerning matrimonial disputes, indicating the importance of jurisdictional convenience and the need for fair adjudication. For example, transfer petitions from Rajasthan to Uttar Pradesh highlight the Court's role in ensuring cases are heard in appropriate forums to prevent bias or inconvenience ["LATA SINGH RAWAL @ LOVELY vs RAHUL AGRAWAL - Supreme Court"], ["LATA SINGH RAWAL @ LOVELY vs RAHUL AGRAWAL - Supreme Court"], ["LATA SINGH RAWAL @ LOVELY vs RAHUL AGRAWAL - Supreme Court"].
Family Law and Court Orders: The Court has transferred cases from Rajasthan to Uttar Pradesh to facilitate justice in matrimonial and family disputes, emphasizing the importance of proper jurisdiction and efficient judicial proceedings ["LATA SINGH RAWAL @ LOVELY vs RAHUL AGRAWAL - Supreme Court"], ["LATA SINGH RAWAL @ LOVELY vs RAHUL AGRAWAL - Supreme Court"].
Government and Administrative Compliance: The Court has directed authorities to comply with directives issued in Lata Singh and related judgments, including ensuring police protection in cases of personal disputes or threats, and to decide representations within stipulated timelines ["Gurmeet Kaur VS State of Uttarakhand - Uttarakhand"], ["JAISUKH PRAVINBHAI KAKHARIA vs STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat"].
Legal Enforcement of Rights in Personal Relationships: The case underscores that the law recognizes the autonomy of individuals in personal relationships, including marriage, and that authorities must act to protect such rights against unlawful interference or threats ["Gurmeet Kaur VS State of Uttarakhand - Uttarakhand"], ["Akanksha Chouhan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"].
Analysis and Conclusion: The Lata Singh case establishes a significant legal principle that individuals' rights to marry and personal liberty are protected under the Constitution, and the State must actively safeguard these rights. It reinforces that law enforcement agencies and authorities are obligated to ensure protection against coercion, violence, and unlawful interference, especially in matrimonial matters. The case also influences procedural aspects, such as case transfers and administrative compliance, to uphold justice and individual rights effectively ["Gurmeet Kaur VS State of Uttarakhand - Uttarakhand"], ["LATA SINGH RAWAL @ LOVELY vs RAHUL AGRAWAL - Supreme Court"], ["JAISUKH PRAVINBHAI KAKHARIA vs STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat"].
References:- ["Gurmeet Kaur VS State of Uttarakhand - Uttarakhand"]- ["State Of U. P. VS Baleshwar Singh - 2023 0 Supreme(SC) 1267"]- ["LATA SINGH RAWAL @ LOVELY vs RAHUL AGRAWAL - Supreme Court"]- ["LATA SINGH RAWAL @ LOVELY vs RAHUL AGRAWAL - Supreme Court"]- ["LATA SINGH RAWAL @ LOVELY vs RAHUL AGRAWAL - Supreme Court"]- ["JAISUKH PRAVINBHAI KAKHARIA vs STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat"]- ["Akanksha Chouhan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"]
In a society where traditions sometimes clash with individual rights, the Supreme Court of India's decision in Lata Singh vs State of Uttar Pradesh stands as a powerful beacon of justice. This case, often cited in matters of personal liberty and marital choice, firmly addresses the scourge of honour killings. If you've ever wondered about the legal stance on violence committed in the name of family 'honour,' this post dives deep into the judgment's implications.
The question at the heart of many discussions is simply: Lata Singh vs State of Uttar Pradesh—what does it mean for Indian law? This 2006 ruling not only protected an individual's right to choose their partner but also issued a stern warning against barbaric practices like honour killings. Let's break it down step by step, drawing from key judicial observations and related precedents.
Lata Singh, a government employee, fell in love with a man from a different caste. Her family vehemently opposed the relationship, leading to threats and attempts to interfere. Lata approached the court seeking protection, highlighting the dangers posed by her relatives. The Supreme Court not only granted her protection but used the opportunity to condemn broader societal issues.
The bench emphasized personal autonomy in marriage, stating that adults have the fundamental right to marry whom they choose, provided it's consensual and legal. This case gained further traction through references in subsequent judgments, such as those involving transfers of matrimonial cases. For instance, petitions citing Lata Singh principles sought transfers from courts in Uttar Pradesh to Delhi for fair trials, underscoring its ongoing relevance [
#LataSinghCase, #HonourKillings, #IndianSupremeCourt
In the case of Lata Singh vs. ... This Court reminds Senior Superintendent of Police, District Udham Singh Nagar the mandate of law, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh (supra), who shall ensure the compliance thereof. 9. ... According to the petition, both the petitioners got married on 16.01.2023 according to the Sikh Rites and Rituals at GurudwaraSangat Sahib situated at Mullakhera, Kuakhera, Parewa, Tehsil Bilaspur, District Rampur, Uttar P....
Pratap Singh was allocated to the State of Uttar Pradesh. ... However, the order, if read in its entirety, makes it clear that the same enjoined the State of Uttar Pradesh to permit the first respondent – Baleshwar Singh to continue his duty with the State of Uttar Pradesh. ... The propriety required the State of Uttar Pradesh to apply either f....
Khosla, the then Secretary to Government, Uttar Pradesh, Excise Department, Smt. Lata Singh, Deputy Secretary to Government in the said department, the Excise Commissioner, Uttar Pradesh and the Assistant Excise Commissioner, Kanpur Circle, Kanpur. ... Lata Singh. ... He made a representation against that order which was also dismissed by the State Government on 26-8-1969, vide Annexure 12. Being dissatisfied with these orders he fi....
Mehta, learned advocate for the petitioners, has submitted that in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh V. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. ... On the facts and in the circumstance of the case, and considering the principles of law laid down by the Supreme Court in Lata Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. ... This Court has heard learned counsel for the respective parties and taken in....
State of Uttar Pradesh And Another. reported in 2007 (1) GLH 41. 10 In Lata Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. ... 8 Learned advocate for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the judgment of Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. ... 11 On the facts and in the circumstance of the case, and considering the principles of ....
LATA BASWARAJ PATNE, JUDICIAL MEMBER 1. Krishna Singh, S/o Ram Murat Singh Aged 34 years, Occ: Track Maintainer-II (Group C) O/o The Senior Section Engineer (Permanent Way) South Central Railway, Guntur Division Nandyal R.S., Andhra Pradesh State. ... Laxmi Kant Singh, S/o Dasharath Singh Aged 42 years, Track Maintainer-III O/o The Senior Section Engineer (Permanent Way) South Central Railway, Guntur Division Danakonda, Andhra Pradesh State....
Bidhuri vs Sneha Lata”, pending before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh to the Principal Family Court, Central District, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi 4. ... before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh to the Principal Family Court, Central District, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi 2. ... IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s).3227/2024 SNEHA LATA Petitioner(s) VERSUS DEVENDRA SINGH BI....
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UTTAR PRADESH FIRST APPEAL NO. ... LATE SABHAPATI PATHAK PRESENT ADDRESS - HOUSE NO 2/411 VIBHAV KHAND ROYAL MOUNT ACADEMY VIBHAV KHAND 2 GOMTI NAGAR , LUCKNOW,UTTAR PRADESH. BUSINESS ADDRESS - ROYAL AWADH VILL BABURIYA NEAR GANDHI NAGAR PULIYA BARABANKI , BARABANKI,UTTAR PRADESH. ... ANIL KUMAR DATED: 21/08/2025 ORDER ORAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UTTAR P....
Lata Singh Rawal @ Lovely” from the Court of learned Judge, Family Court No.1 at Ajmer (Rajasthan) to the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Hathras (Uttar Pradesh)from the Court of the learned Judge, Family Court No.1 at Ajmer (Rajasthan) to the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Hathras (Uttar Pradesh) 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1898/2021 SMT.LATA #H....
Manoj Kumar Singh, S/o Nandu Singh Aged 32 years, Track Maintainer II O/o The Senior Section Engineer (Permanent Way) South Central Railway, Guntakal Division Adoni R.S., Andhra Pradesh State. …..Applicants (By Advocate Sri K R K V Prasad) Vs. ... The Divisional Railway Manager East Central Railway, Mughalsarai Division (Deendayal Upadyaya Division) Mughalsarai, Uttar Pradesh State. ….Respondents (By Advocate Sri V.Vinod Kumar, Senior Panel Counsel for Central Governm....
Thus, in view of the law referred to hereinabove, mere ascendance of the appellant cannot be taken as a circumstance which gives rise to draw an adverse inference against him.” State of Uttar Pradesh, Paramjeet Singh vs. State of Uttarakhand and Dara Singh vs. Republic of India].
The Court observed that a humane attitude is required to be adopted by a Judge while dealing with an application for remanding a suspect or accused person to police custody or judicial custody. This case before the Supreme Court was not under the provisions of the NDPS Act. 10. Dataram Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another (supra)
State through CBI, (2010) 9 SCC 747 and the Nirbhaya’s case, which is cited as Mukesh and anr. vs. State (NCT of Delhi) and ors., (2017) 6 SCC 1 etc. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2014) 5 SCC 509, Santosh Kumar Singh vs.
In State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Devendra Singh, MANU/SC/0343/2004 while discussing the issue of behavior of witness commented as under :-
2. Learned Counsel has also relied on the following decisions: (1) Sampelly Satyanarayana Rao vs. Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency, (2016) 10 SCC 458 (2) Mohit alias Sonu and Another vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, (2013) 7 SCC 789 (3) Rishipal Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, (2014) 7 SCC 215
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
