Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
The principle that a terminated contract cannot be revived without mutual agreement is reiterated, and once a contract is terminated, legal remedies are generally limited to damages unless specific revival clauses exist ["Lotus Logistics and Developers Pvt. Ltd. vs Evertop Apartments Co-operative Housing Society Limited - Bombay"], ["BESJAYA MAJU SDN BHD vs HIM DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD & ORS - High Court"].
Damages and Delay Clauses - Main points and insights:
When delays are extended by mutual consent or tacit agreement, liability for damages is mitigated, and damages are only recoverable to the extent attributable to breach or default ["BESJAYA MAJU SDN BHD vs HIM DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD & ORS - High Court"], ["Viraj Kamman Real Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd. VS Gopal Terrace Co-Op Housing Society Ltd. - Bombay"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED vs MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & Anr - Appellate Tribunal for Electricity"]- ["Ghh Bumi Mining Services Pvt. Ltd. VS Hindustan Zinc Ltd. - Delhi"]- ["Lotus Logistics and Developers Pvt. Ltd. vs Evertop Apartments Co-operative Housing Society Limited - Bombay"]- ["BESJAYA MAJU SDN BHD vs HIM DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD & ORS - High Court"]- ["Aditya and Rashmi Construction Pvt. Ltd. VS State of Jharkhand, through the Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand - Jharkhand"]- ["Thiess Minecs India Pvt. Ltd. VS NTPC Ltd. - Delhi"]- ["Viraj Kamman Real Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd. VS Gopal Terrace Co-Op Housing Society Ltd. - Bombay"]
In the world of real estate and construction, development agreements are crucial for turning visions into reality. But what happens when delays occur, and there's a clause for damages but no explicit provision for ending the contract? A common question arises: When there is no clause for termination of contract, but a clause for damages on account of delay, the development agreement cannot be terminated. This issue often leads to disputes, arbitration, and court battles. This post breaks down the legal principles, precedents, and practical implications to help you navigate such scenarios.
Important Disclaimer: This article provides general information based on legal precedents and is not a substitute for professional legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for advice tailored to your situation.
Generally, in the absence of an express clause for termination, a development agreement that contains only a clause for damages on account of delay cannot be lawfully terminated. Such agreements are inherently determinable but terminable only through prescribed contractual mechanisms, like mutual consent or specific breach remedies Indeen Bio Power Limited vs EFS Facilities Service (India) Pvt. Ltd. - Delhi (2019). The presence of a damages clause does not automatically grant termination rights; it serves as compensation for breaches or delays J. G. Engineers Pvt. Ltd. VS Union of India - 2011 4 Supreme 531.
Without an explicit termination clause, the relationship persists until parties mutually agree to end it or pursue lawful processes like claiming damages for fundamental breaches Ghaziabad Development Authority VS Union Of India - 2000 4 Supreme 373Food Corporation Of India VS Babulal Agrawal - 2004 1 Supreme 197.
Many contracts, especially development agreements, lack fixed terms and are considered determinable by nature. Courts have held that such agreements allow termination with reasonable notice, reflecting their flexible structure. For instance, in Rajasthan Breweries Limited v. The Stroh Brewery Company, a commercial contract was terminable by notice even without a specific clause Kedar Darshan Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. VS Messrs Nooman Developers - 2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 569. Similarly, the Supreme Court's ruling in DLF Home Developers clarifies that non-expressly non-terminable agreements are generally terminable at will, subject to damages for wrongful termination Kedar Darshan Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. VS Messrs Nooman Developers - 2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 569.
However, if the contract specifies only damages for delay, it implies a focus on performance obligations rather than abrupt endings. The aggrieved party may claim compensation but cannot unilaterally terminate based solely on delay Ghaziabad Development Authority VS Union Of India - 2000 4 Supreme 373.
Liquidated damages clauses cap liability for delays, providing a pre-agreed remedy. They do not equate to a termination right. As noted, clauses for damages and their scope, emphasizing that damages do not equate to a right to terminate J. G. Engineers Pvt. Ltd. VS Union of India - 2011 4 Supreme 531. This prevents arbitrary endings and promotes continuity.
In practice, parties might imply consent to extensions through conduct, mitigating damages but not absolving obligations. For example, in a Malaysian joint venture case, the court held that The Plaintiff's damages may still accrue for the extended period, but must account for its tacit agreement to allow delays BESJAYA MAJU SDN BHD vs HIM DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD & ORS. Implied consent does not waive breach liabilities, reinforcing that damages persist without enabling termination unless specified BESJAYA MAJU SDN BHD vs HIM DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD & ORS.
In cases involving determinable contracts, courts refuse injunctions against termination. One judgment states: The main legal point established in the judgment is that in the case of a determinable contract, no injunction against termination and enforcement of the contract can be issued C. Gopal Reddy And Company VS National Highways And Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. - 2023 Supreme(Del) 1729. Here, termination under Clause 23.1 for contractor default was upheld, but only because an explicit clause existed—highlighting the contrast with agreements lacking such provisions.
Even without a termination clause, fundamental breaches can justify ending the contract under general law. In a development dispute, the court affirmed: Even if there is no provision in agreement for termination of agreement non-etheless under law if there is breach of terms and conditions of contract parties are entitled to terminate contract Srushti Raj Enterprise (india) Ltd VS Tilak Safalya Co-operative Housing Societies Ltd - 2018 Supreme(Bom) 2519. However, this requires evidence of substantial non-performance, not mere delay covered by damages.
In another instance, time being the essence allowed termination for failure to meet deadlines: A party to a contract may terminate the agreement if the other party fails to perform essential obligations within the stipulated timeframe, as time is of the essence in contracts CHEK SAM SALLEH vs PEMBINAAN LERCAST SDN BHD & ANOR. Yet, for delay-specific damages clauses, termination remains restricted.
Some contracts explicitly bar termination: The Parties agree and acknowledge that upon the execution of the Contract Agreements, this agreement cannot be terminated for any reasons whatsoever, unless the contract agreements are terminated Indeen Bio Power Limited VS EFS Facilities Service (India) Pvt. Ltd. - 2019 Supreme(Del) 1602. Termination for failing financial close was valid due to specific triggers Rail Land Development Authority VS Parsvnath Developers Limited - 2019 Supreme(Del) 894. These underscore that absent such language, damages alone do not suffice.
In road construction cases, terminations for non-completion were upheld with liquidated damages pursued separately: The court upheld the validity of contract termination due to non-completion of work, affirming that claims for liquidated damages should be pursued in civil court Sahabuddin Siddique vs Union Of India - 2025 Supreme(Gau) 181.
Not all contracts are freely terminable. If expressly non-terminable or if termination violates core terms, courts may intervene Indeen Bio Power Limited vs EFS Facilities Service (India) Pvt. Ltd. - Delhi (2019). Joint ventures with irrevocable powers of attorney until project completion exemplify this CHEK SAM SALLEH vs PEMBINAAN LERCAST SDN BHD & ANOR. External factors like COVID-19 do not automatically excuse performance unless proven BESJAYA MAJU SDN BHD vs HIM DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD & ORS.
Parties allowing delays via conduct may face adjusted damages but upheld obligations: When time is extended by implied consent, the defaulting party's liability for damages is mitigated to the extent that the delay is attributable to the granting party's consent BESJAYA MAJU SDN BHD vs HIM DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD & ORS.
Always document communications to establish implied consents or breaches.
In summary, a development agreement without a termination clause but with damages for delay generally cannot be unilaterally terminated on delay grounds alone. It remains enforceable via damages, mutual consent, or severe breach remedies, aligning with principles for determinable contracts Ghaziabad Development Authority VS Union Of India - 2000 4 Supreme 373. Precedents like Rajasthan Breweries and DLF Home Developers emphasize reasonable notice or lawful processes Kedar Darshan Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. VS Messrs Nooman Developers - 2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 569.
Key Takeaways:- Include explicit termination clauses to avoid ambiguity.- Damages clauses remedy delays but rarely enable endings.- Courts assess contract nature and breaches case-by-case.- Seek legal counsel early to protect interests.
By understanding these nuances, parties can better draft agreements and mitigate risks in dynamic projects.
#ContractLaw #DevelopmentAgreement #TerminationClause
But, the word, "thereafter" cannot be interpreted to mean that the agreement can be terminated at any time even after 5 or 10 years i.e., during the course when it is being performed. ... The Respondent No.2 terminated the PPA after the said delay, and their right to do so was not waived. ... In the present case, the Respondent No. 2 chose not to invoke this clause for termination of PPA when Force majeure condition regarding delay in grant of EC an....
Section 41 vide clause (ha) states that an injunction cannot be granted in cases where it would impede or delay the progress or completion of any infrastructure project or interfere with the continued provision of relevant facility related thereto. ... carried out the requisite remedy, the contract could have been terminated. ... Copy of the contract dated 30.12.2020 executed between the parties is on record. Clause 4 relates to `consequence of default' and ....
That even otherwise, statement made before this Court cannot amount to revival of the terminated Development Agreement. That revival of a contract requires mutual agreement between the parties to revive terminated contract. ... As regards Respondent’s contention that Claimant having terminated the Development Agreement was not entitled to seek specific performance of Clause 5 and....
The Plaintiffs damages may still accrue for the extended period but must account for its tacit agreement to allow delays. [30] The Plaintiff allowed the Defendants to continue working on obtaining approvals beyond the original deadlines. ... (d) Damages [28] When time is extended by implied consent, the defaulting party's liability for damages is mitigated to the extent that the delay is attributable to the granting party's consent. ... [2] The Plaintiff asserts its right to claim co....
Clause 23 of the Contract provides for termination. Clause 23.1 specifically provides for Termination for Contractor Default. ... In the instant case, the impugned termination letter notes that due to non-exhaustive fundamental breaches and in view of the EPC Contractor's default in fulfilling contractual obligations, the Authority terminated the Contract Agreement signed on 17.08.2021 in accordance with Clause 23.....
Even otherwise the question of liquidated damages would arise only when the contract is terminated on account of breach of the terms and conditions of the contract and when the termination of the contract itself is held to be bad in law the consequences which follow which may include liquidated damages ... was terminated and as liquidated damages in terms of the contract agreement#HL_END....
The Plaintiff's damages may still accrue for the extended period, but must account for its tacit agreement to allow delays. ... As emerged at trial, this dispute is not merely about delayed approvals and missed deadlines but about the expectations and responsibilities of parties engaged in a sophisticated land development agreement. ... The Defendants' witnesses largely relied on external factors and procedural delays, but failed to substantiate that these obstacles were beyond their control or that the....
The Plaintiff's damages may still accrue for the extended period, but must account for its tacit agreement to allow delays. [30] The Plaintiff allowed the Defendants to continue working on obtaining approvals beyond the original deadlines. ... (d) Damages [28] When time is extended by implied consent, the defaulting party's liability for damages is mitigated to the extent that the delay is attributable to the granting party's consent. ... [2] The Plaintiff asserts its right to claim ....
The concession agreement is terminated on account of failure of the contractor/appellant herein in achieving 'financial close' for the project within 180 days from the date of execution of concession agreement and also within additional 120 days granted on the condition of payment of delay damages to ... The action of termination of contract, if can be held valid on any one count, it cannot be invalidated on account#HL_END....
(See para 11 (xvii) of the Statement of Defence); (i) The JV Agreement has an irrevocable power of attorney clause. The Power of Attorney cannot be terminated until the completion of the project. ... Clause 20 of the JV Agreement reads: "20. Time Essence of Contract Time whenever mentioned shall be of essence of the contract in all respects." [59] In Sime Hok Sdn Bhd v. ... [82] P prayed for general damages, special damag....
(ii) Encash and appropriate the Bank Guarantee, if any, for and in respect of the outstanding advance payment and interest thereon;and 4.2. It is also stated that the PKG-II was completely abandoned by the contractor since October, 2023 and no work was undertaken as per work programme and progress of the contract, on the date of termination of contract, was only 26.21%, and that the authority had imposed liquidated damages as per Clause 10. (i) En-cash and appropriate the performance security, additional performance security, if any, and retention money, or in the event the contractor has f....
There is a clause which provides for termination of the contract. The Duration for the contract shall be for 5 years commencing from the date of signing the contract or commencement of operation in Schools whichever is later.
Indeen shall be entitled to levy liquidated damages at the rate of 0.5% of the Consolidated Contract Price (excluding taxes and duties) per week of delay subject to a maximum of 5% of the Consolidated Contract Price (excluding taxes and duties). The Parties agree and acknowledge that upon the execution of the Contract Agreements, this agreement cannot be terminated for any reasons whatsoever, unless the contract agreements are terminated.), while provision for damages for delay, liquidated damages and tests for completion is provided under Clause 8 (8. Damages 8.1 Delay Damages 8.1....
The findings in that regard as made in the award were thus clearly illegal and ought not to have confirmed by the learned single Judge. It is contended that it was illegal for the respondent to terminate the agreement. The second contention is that in the absence of any termination clause in the development agreement and the parties having agreed to a specific mechanism as contained in clauses 8 and 36 of the agreement for rent and completion of work, the respondent could not have terminated the agreement. The learned Arbitrator ought to have held that the termination on th....
Thus, it cannot be accepted that clause 12.5(i) is merely or only an indemnity clause. This part of the stipulation about none of the parties having any claim of damages against each other only qualifies the consequences arising out of the termination namely the mutual liabilities which may arise on account of such termination. This submission overlooks the fact that basically it is a termination clause and the concluding part of 12.5(i) only indemnifies the party against the claim for damages against each other in the event of such termination. Basically clause 12.5(i) is a termin....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
