AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
The collection of cases reflects a range of judicial decisions, including granting bail with conditions, quashing FIRs after settlements, ordering refunds, dismissing delayed review petitions, and upholding government responses under RTI. The common thread emphasizes adherence to procedural timelines, the importance of settlement agreements, and the court’s cautious approach in preliminary stages. The specific order W P C 5757 2025 primarily pertains to the direction for the government to proceed with the selection process for an academic post, affirming the lower court’s decision and dismissing the appeal.

Search Results for "W P C 5757 2025 Court Order"

Mallu Srinivasulu Reddy vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 9213 India - High Court of Andhra Pradesh

K Sreenivasa Reddy, J

... ... Findings of Court: ... Bail was granted to the petitioner upon execution of a personal bond and sureties. ... bail application - The petitioner sought bail for alleged offences punishable with imprisonment of less than three years - The court ... (Paras 4 - 5) ... ... (B) Criminal Law - Principles for granting bail - The court observed that the length of judicial ... Respondent No.2 is impleaded as per the Court order dated 23.06.2025 in I.A.No.1 of 2025 ....

Ananthi vs The State Rep by The Inspector of Police, K-10, Koyambedu Police Station, Chennai

2025 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 12124 India - High Court of Madras

G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J

The court ultimately quashed the FIR and allowed the petition, with costs imposed on petitioners. ... The parties reached an amicable settlement and filed a Joint Compromise Memo, which the court found satisfactory. ... The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai. Crl.O.P.No.5757 of 2025 10.03.2025 ... 10.03.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order rts G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. ... The terms of Joint Compromise Mem....

M/S JVG TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED vs COMMISSIONER CGST, DELHI WEST AND ANR

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 4908 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Prathiba M. Singh, Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, JJ

The court ruled that the refund order must be honored as there was no active challenge to the Appellate Authority's decision, emphasizing ... The court found the withholding to be unjustified in light of previous orders by the Appellate Authority. ... (C) 3824/2025 dated 3rd April, 2025 wherein the Court observed as under: “ … 12. ... (C) 5757/2025 Page 1 of 6 ITC as per the provisions of clause (i) to the proviso of Section 54 (3) of the CGST Act. 4....

SENSA CORE MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION PVT LTD vs THE ANDHRA PRADESH MEDICAL SERVICES INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION(APMSIDC)

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 514 India - High Court of Andhra Pradesh

K MANMADHA RAO, J

... ... Findings of Court: ... The court noted the extension of the rate contract for blood glucose strips until 31.06.2025, concluding ... - Court found no cause for adjudication as rate contract was extended. ... equipment, challenged a tender notification for blood glucose testing strips, asserting that it had already fulfilled a purchase order ... Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Medical Health and Family Welfare, as the 2nd r....

Bali @ Bali Nahak and others vs State of Orissa

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 1769 India - Orissa High Court

G. SATAPATHY, J

... ... Findings of Court: ... The court granted bail due to prior detentions and the nature of accusations. ... Conditions for bail were set, including non-commission of further offences and regular attendance in court. ... ... ... Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of conditions to ensure attendance and prevent future offenses. ... Accordingly, these BLAPL Nos. 5754, 3137, 3141, 3145, 5233, 5757, 5853 of 2025 stand disposed of. ... ORDER(ORAL) ....

Bishun son of Shri Sudhu vs Union of India through the Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 9321 India - Central Administrative Tribunal

Hon’ble Mr Justice Rameshwar Vyas, J, Hon’ble Dr AMIT SAHAI, ACJ

... ... (D) ... ... Findings of Court: ... - The applicants are not entitled for pension under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972. - The applicants ... Accordingly, the instant OAs are dismissed in terms of order dated 15.07.2025 passed by us in OA No. 68/2018 [Jokhan Prasad v. Union of India & Ors]. No orders as to costs. ... Similar provisions have been interpreted by the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 5757 of 2007 [Union of India through Director General Department of Posts,....

Albeen Josebh Ahmed, Son of Jahur Uddin Ahmed vs Badal Khan, Son of Samad Khan

2025 0 Supreme(Gau) 1725 India - IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

ASHUTOSH KUMAR, CJ., ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

(Paras 2, 9) ... ... Findings of Court: ... The court upheld the lower court's order to proceed ... The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 05.05.2025 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in WP(C) No.5757/2024, whereby the respondents therein have been directed to proceed with the selection process for the post of Assistant Professor in the Mandia Anchalik College, Mandia ... The candidates lower in the list than the top 7(seven) candidates but who could ....

Prasad and Company (Project Works) Pvt. Ltd. vs National Building Construction Corporation Limited

2025 0 Supreme(Gau) 926 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH

NELSON SAILO

concerning tender process for a public works project - Petitioners allege lack of progress on work despite the passage of time - Court ... Therefore, it is clear that the review petition having been filed on 19.02.2025 and the order sought to be reviewed having been passed on 22.08.2024, there is delay in filing the review petition and on this ground itself, the review petition should be dismissed. ... In this connection, it may be gainful to refer to the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court on ....

Chander Gupta Maurya vs PIO, Office of the Superintendent, Central Jail No. 6, Tihar

2025 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 3307 India - Central Information Commission

Vinod Kumar Tiwari, IC

... ... Findings of Court: ... Responses were upheld as adequate under privacy provisions of the RTI Act. ... Date of Hearing : 08.08.2025 Date of Decision : 14.08.2025 INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : Vinod Kumar Tiwari Relevant facts emerging from appeal: RTI application filed on : 20.08.2023 CPIO replied on : 01.09.2023, 08.09.2023, 20.09.2023, 29.09.2023, 03.10.2023 ... F.10(3476489)/ID-10980- H/CJ/Legal/2023/53582/5757-58 dated 28.08.2023 for taking immediate necessary action at the earliest under RTI Act-2005. However,....

Siddappa Jalihal S/o Sharanappa Jalihal Vs State Of Karnataka, Energy Department

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 4683 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

S.G.PANDIT

Court found petitions premature as petitioners could respond to notices before seeking judicial intervention. ... (Paras 3 to 10) ... ... (B) Court's authority - The Court cannot consider the merits of the show cause notices without ... ORAL COMMON ORDER Heard Sri Krishna S. ... At this stage, this Court cannot go into the correctness or otherwise of the second show cause notices. ... Since the question involved in all the above writ petitions are common, all the writ petitions are taken up for disposal together and d....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top