Back
M. R. SHAH, ANIRUDDHA BOSE
Karan Goyal – Appellant
Versus
Registrar General, Delhi High Court – Respondent
ORDER
1. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and after considering the fact that the High Court in the impugned judgment and order has considered in detail each and every question and the answers and thereafter has negated the challenge made on behalf of the petitioner, we see no reason to exercise our jurisdiction under Article 136(1) of the Constitution. The Special Petition stands dismissed.
2. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
The court's discretion to exercise jurisdiction under Article 136(1) is influenced by the thorough consideration and negation of challenges by the lower court.
The main legal point established is that the Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India does not warrant interference with the High Court's order.
The court found no grounds to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of the High Court of Delhi.
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's ruling, affirming no substantial grounds for intervention under Article 136.
The court exercised its discretion to condone delay and dismissed the petition under Article 136 without interference, leaving law questions open.
Dismissal of petitions and applications with liberty to approach the High Court, and refusal to entertain a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution based on the issue raised.
Courts generally defer to the decisions of lower courts unless there is a clear error on the record.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
