SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 804

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, C.V.RAMULU
Lambadi Pedda Bhadru – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Ali Hussain – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THESE writ appeals may be disposed of by a common judgment since they are directed against the judgment dated 9-12-1997 rendered by a learned Single Judge of this court in W. P. Nos. 17020 of 1994 and 1461 of 1995 separately, whereunder the very proceedings of the Joint Collector, Medak district at Sanga Reddy dated 22-6-1994 were quashed at the instance of different parties. Introduction:

( 2 ) SHORN of all the avoidable details - the simple question that falls for consideration in this batch of writ appeals relates to the validity of the order passed by the Joint collector, Additional District Magistrate, medak District at Sanga Reddy dated 22-6-1994 whereunder directions have been issued to the Mandal Revenue Officer, patancheru "to re-write the records and maintain records as was prevailing prior to making entries in favour of the decree holders in O. S. No. 3 of 1970".

( 3 ) THE learned Single Judge allowed the writ petitions filed by the respondents- writ petitioners and accordingly quashed the said proceedings of the Joint Collector. Hence these writ appeals.

( 4 ) IN order to consider as to whether the judgment of the learned Single Judge suffers

























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top