Ramesh Ranganathan, J.

Review can be sought not only by those who were parties to the order but even by third parties who are affected by such an order. (P. Neelakanteswaramma v. Uppari Muthamma (1998 (3) An.W.R. 132 (D.B). Leave as sought for, to file the Review Petition, is therefore granted.

The petitioner (who appeared and presented his case before this Court in person) seeks review of the order of this Court dated 19.01.2011, dismissing W.A. No.556 of 2010 as an abuse of process of law with the following directions:

“1. the Registry should not accept any case or proceeding, application filed by Sri T.D. Dayal either as a party in person or as a holder of a GPA for third parties; all the District and Subordinate Courts in the State of Andhra Pradesh were also directed to abide by this direction;

2. the Security Officer, Incharge of the High Court Security, should not allow Sri T.D.Dayal to enter the High Court premises/precincts and to be stopped and sent away from the entry point itself unless he is specifically summoned by the Court to answer a charge or as a witness;

3. the Registry should communicate a copy of the order forthwith to the Secretary, Bar Council o