Back
V. R. K. KRUPA SAGAR
Dadi Chinna Rao (Died) per LRs A- 2 to 4 S/o. Late Simhachalam – Appellant
Versus
Ganala Parvathi W/o. G. Srinivasa Rao – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
1. Perused the proceeding sheet dated 28.11.2023 & 4.01.2023 and the earlier orders of this Court. There was no representation for the appellants.
2. Today, the matter has been listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. However, there is no representation for the appellants.
3. In the result, this appeal is ‘dismissed for non-prosecution’. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
Non-prosecution of an appeal may lead to its dismissal.
Non-prosecution leading to dismissal of appeal.
The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellants fail to appear and show no inclination to prosecute the appeal.
Failure to prosecute the appeal by not being represented in court can lead to dismissal.
Dismissal for non-prosecution due to lack of representation and inclination to prosecute the appeal.
Failure to prosecute the appeal by appearing for the hearing may lead to dismissal of the appeal suit.
Non-prosecution of an appeal can lead to its dismissal.
Non-prosecution due to lack of representation can lead to dismissal of an appeal.
A petition may be dismissed for non-prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear in court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
