SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 28

V. R. K. KRUPA SAGAR
Dadi Chinna Rao (Died) per LRs A- 2 to 4 S/o. Late Simhachalam – Appellant
Versus
Ganala Parvathi W/o. G. Srinivasa Rao – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : L RAVICHANDER
For the Respondents: K.V. SUBRAHMANYA NARUSU

JUDGMENT:

1. Perused the proceeding sheet dated 28.11.2023 & 4.01.2023 and the earlier orders of this Court. There was no representation for the appellants.

2. Today, the matter has been listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. However, there is no representation for the appellants.

3. In the result, this appeal is ‘dismissed for non-prosecution’. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top