Back
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Chitturi Rama Rao S/o. Purushottam – Appellant
Versus
Garlapati Chandravathi W/o. Krishna Murthy – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. When the matter was listed on 29.01.2024, learned counsel for the respondents was alone present and there was no representation on behalf of the appellant and the matter was posted to 02.02.2024, under the caption “For Dismissal”.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It seems that the appellant is no inclined to prosecute the appeal.
3. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
Non-prosecution of an appeal can lead to its dismissal.
Dismissal for non-prosecution due to lack of representation and inclination to prosecute the appeal.
Non-prosecution leading to dismissal of appeal.
Failure to prosecute the appeal by not being represented in court can lead to dismissal.
Non-prosecution of an appeal may lead to its dismissal.
Non-appearance and lack of inclination to prosecute the appeal can lead to dismissal of the suit.
Non-prosecution due to lack of representation can lead to dismissal of an appeal.
Failure to appear for hearings resulted in dismissal for non-prosecution, emphasizing the importance of diligence in legal proceedings.
Non-representation from the appellant in court leads to dismissal of the appeal for non-prosecution.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to appellant's failure to appear.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
