Back
B. V. L. N. CHAKRAVARTHI
Dudala Varalakshmi W/o. Late Nageswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Govardhana Ramakrishna S/o. Bhaskara Rama Murthy – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
No representation on either side though, posted under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. There was no representation for the appellants/claimants on the previous three (03) adjournments i.e., 07.11.2023, 12.12.2023 and 05.01.2024.
2. In that view of the matter, the Appeal is ‘dismissed for non-prosecution’. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Non-prosecution due to lack of representation can lead to dismissal of an appeal.
Dismissal for non-prosecution due to lack of representation and inclination to prosecute the appeal.
Failure to prosecute the appeal by not being represented in court can lead to dismissal.
The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellants fail to appear and show no inclination to prosecute the appeal.
Non-prosecution of an appeal may lead to its dismissal.
Non-prosecution leading to dismissal of appeal.
Non-prosecution of an appeal can lead to its dismissal.
Non-representation of the appellant in court leads to dismissal for non-prosecution.
Failure to prosecute the appeal by appearing for the hearing may lead to dismissal of the appeal suit.
A dismissal for non-prosecution may occur if a party fails to be present during hearings, emphasizing procedural compliance in appeals.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
