Back
V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
General Manager, Ministry of Railways, Northern Railway, Baroda House, New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
P. S. R. Cashew Products By P. Krishna Murthy – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. When the matter is listed on 26.12.2023 and 23.01.2024, there was no representation on either side and the same was adjourned to today i.e., on 25.01.2024 under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
2. Even though the matter was listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on either side.
3. Hence, this Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Appeal shall stand closed.
Failure to prosecute the appeal by not being represented in court can lead to dismissal.
Dismissal for non-prosecution due to lack of representation and inclination to prosecute the appeal.
The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellants fail to appear and show no inclination to prosecute the appeal.
Non-prosecution due to lack of representation can lead to dismissal of an appeal.
Non-prosecution of an appeal may lead to its dismissal.
Failure to prosecute the appeal by appearing for the hearing may lead to dismissal of the appeal suit.
Non-prosecution of an appeal can lead to its dismissal.
Non-prosecution leading to dismissal of appeal.
An appeal may be dismissed for non-prosecution if the appellant fails to appear and represent their case.
Non-representation from the appellant in court leads to dismissal of the appeal for non-prosecution.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
