SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1399

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
K.Sreenivasa Reddy, J.
Nara Chandrababu Naidu - Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh - Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 6942 of 2023
Decided On : 22-09-2023

Prior approval under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act is only required for offenses relating to public officials' duties; misconduct that constitutes a crime does not benefit from this protection.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 17A - Criminal petition to quash FIR alleging misappropriation of public funds by technology partners and public officials through inflated project costs and fraudulent practices - Court examined the statutory protections afforded to public servants engaging in official duties and the requirements for prior sanction under Section 17A - Noted that the petitioner was implicated post-inquiry without compliance of aforementioned provisions - Found that actions taken were within official capacity and justiciability of claims to establish prima facie case - Dismissed the petition, allowing ongoing investigation. (Paras 3, 10, 12, 29, 36)

(B) Prior Approval Requirement - Courts articulated that prior approval is required only for inquiries related to decisions made in discharge of official functions - If acts constituting the offense did not relate to official duties, prior approval is not necessary. (Paras 12, 13)

(C) Investigation Scope - The court emphasized that investigative powers should not be obstructed at preliminary stages unless no cognizable offense is disclosed, reinforcing judicial restraint. (Paras 10, 36)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, implicated as accused No. 37 in significant alleged corruption, was involved in the establishment of the APSSDC and funded projects with inflated costs via fraudulent procurement methods by various shell companies. The CID registered the FIR on 9/12/2021, amidst claims of siphoning off substantial public funds through deceptive practices facilitated by the petitioner.

Findings of Court:
The court recognized that the investigation was ongoing and substantial evidence had been collected, including witness statements and documents indicative of criminal misappropriation linked to the public servant's decisions.

Issues: The primary issues concerned the adherence to Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act regarding prior approval for investigation against public servants and the legality of referencing pre-existing inquiries against other accused parties.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the petitioner's actions fell beyond protective parameters of Section 17A, noting misbehavior and abuse of position in public service, justifying the ongoing investigation without predetermined limitations on accountability for public officials.

Result: Criminal petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. filing of petition under sec. 482 crpc to quash fir. (Para 1 , 2)
2. allegations of financial misappropriation and irregularities in public funds. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. discussion on law applicable for investigation against public servants. (Para 6 , 7 , 9 , 10)
4. court's position on procedural norms and necessity for investigation. (Para 8 , 11 , 12)
5. outcomes of legal proceedings and decision on dismissed petition. (Para 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT

1. This Criminal Petition, under Sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 'CrPC'), is filed seeking to quash FIR in crime No.29 of 2021 of C.I.D. P.S., A.P., Amaravathi, Mangalagiri, against the petitioner, who is arrayed as accused No.37, and the consequential order of remand dtd. 10/9/2023, and the Order in Crl.M.P.No.1096 of 2023, dtd. 10/9/2023, passed by the learned Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases-cum-III Additional District Judge, Vijayawada in the aforesaid crime.

2. Based on a report lodged by the Chairman of the Andhra Pradesh State Skill Development Corporation (for short, 'APSSDC'), the aforesaid crime was registered by the CID. The allegations, in brief, are as follows. APSSDC was incorporated by virtue of G.O.Ms.No.47 (HE) (EC.A2) Department, dtd. 13/12/2014. SIEMENS offers training programme in collaboration with various State Governments. APSSDC deputed a team to visit SIEMENS Centres of Excellence, which were already established in Gujarat, and to submit a report. During negotiations, State Government agreed to establish SIEMENS Centre of Excellence, Technical Skill Development Institutions and Skill Development Centres in different clusters. Six clusters were formed at the inception at a cost of Rs.546,84,18,908.00, with SIEMENS and Design Tech providing a grant-in-aid of 90% i.e. Rs.491,84,18,908.00 and the Government's share thereof 10% Rs.55,00,00,000.00, and a Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) was entered into, between the APSSDC and SIEMENS, pursuant to G.O.Ms.no.4, dtd. 30/6/2017 of Skill Development Enterpreneurship and Innovation (Skills) Department. Tax investigation by the Additional Director General, GST, Intelligence, Pune in respect of claims of availing of CENVAT credit by M/s. Design Tech Systems Private Limited and M/s. Skillar Enterprises India Private Limited led to unearthing a huge financial scam involving crores of rupees by M/s. SIEMENS Industry Software India Private Limited and M/s. Design Tech Systems Private Limited, and the funds relate to the APSSDC.

As per the Memorandum of Agreement, Design Tech has to provide training software development including various sub-modules designed for high end software for advance manufacturing CAD/CAM. It does not contemplate sub-contract. However, SIEMENS and Design Tech sub-contracted a large part of its work to M/s. Skiller Enterprises Private Limited, New Delhi with self centric Solomnon's Wisdom. It is the claim of Design Tech that Skiller Enterprises Private Limited provided training software development including various sub-modules designed for high end software for advance manufacturing of CAD/CAM, and royalty and subscription were paid to Skillar as they developed the software. M/s. Skiller directly supplied the same to the Skill Development Centers in Andhra Pradesh.

When the tax authorities confronted Skillar, it claimed that no technical work was sub-contracted and the training software development including various submodules provided are technical material and royalty and subscription were wrongly mentioned in invoices. A.D.G.G.I., Pune concluded that both service provider and service receiver took contradictory stands regarding the nature of service, and in depth scrutiny into the records by A.D.G.G.I. revealed that training development software including various sub-modules shown as supplied by Skillar to Design Tech were purchased by Skillar from various companies. The said companies are shell/defunct companies and they were issuing invoices without providing any s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top