IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
K.Sreenivasa Reddy, J.
Nara Chandrababu Naidu - Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh - Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 6942 of 2023
Decided On : 22-09-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of petition under sec. 482 crpc to quash fir. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. allegations of financial misappropriation and irregularities in public funds. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. discussion on law applicable for investigation against public servants. (Para 6 , 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's position on procedural norms and necessity for investigation. (Para 8 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. outcomes of legal proceedings and decision on dismissed petition. (Para 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT
1. This Criminal Petition, under Sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 'CrPC'), is filed seeking to quash FIR in crime No.29 of 2021 of C.I.D. P.S., A.P., Amaravathi, Mangalagiri, against the petitioner, who is arrayed as accused No.37, and the consequential order of remand dtd. 10/9/2023, and the Order in Crl.M.P.No.1096 of 2023, dtd. 10/9/2023, passed by the learned Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases-cum-III Additional District Judge, Vijayawada in the aforesaid crime.
2. Based on a report lodged by the Chairman of the Andhra Pradesh State Skill Development Corporation (for short, 'APSSDC'), the aforesaid crime was registered by the CID. The allegations, in brief, are as follows. APSSDC was incorporated by virtue of G.O.Ms.No.47 (HE) (EC.A2) Department, dtd. 13/12/2014. SIEMENS offers training programme in collaboration with various State Governments. APSSDC deputed a team to visit SIEMENS Centres of Excellence, which were already established in Gujarat, and to submit a report. During negotiations, State Government agreed to establish SIEMENS Centre of Excellence, Technical Skill Development Institutions and Skill Development Centres in different clusters. Six clusters were formed at the inception at a cost of Rs.546,84,18,908.00, with SIEMENS and Design Tech providing a grant-in-aid of 90% i.e. Rs.491,84,18,908.00 and the Government's share thereof 10% Rs.55,00,00,000.00, and a Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) was entered into, between the APSSDC and SIEMENS, pursuant to G.O.Ms.no.4, dtd. 30/6/2017 of Skill Development Enterpreneurship and Innovation (Skills) Department. Tax investigation by the Additional Director General, GST, Intelligence, Pune in respect of claims of availing of CENVAT credit by M/s. Design Tech Systems Private Limited and M/s. Skillar Enterprises India Private Limited led to unearthing a huge financial scam involving crores of rupees by M/s. SIEMENS Industry Software India Private Limited and M/s. Design Tech Systems Private Limited, and the funds relate to the APSSDC.
As per the Memorandum of Agreement, Design Tech has to provide training software development including various sub-modules designed for high end software for advance manufacturing CAD/CAM. It does not contemplate sub-contract. However, SIEMENS and Design Tech sub-contracted a large part of its work to M/s. Skiller Enterprises Private Limited, New Delhi with self centric Solomnon's Wisdom. It is the claim of Design Tech that Skiller Enterprises Private Limited provided training software development including various sub-modules designed for high end software for advance manufacturing of CAD/CAM, and royalty and subscription were paid to Skillar as they developed the software. M/s. Skiller directly supplied the same to the Skill Development Centers in Andhra Pradesh.
When the tax authorities confronted Skillar, it claimed that no technical work was sub-contracted and the training software development including various submodules provided are technical material and royalty and subscription were wrongly mentioned in invoices. A.D.G.G.I., Pune concluded that both service provider and service receiver took contradictory stands regarding the nature of service, and in depth scrutiny into the records by A.D.G.G.I. revealed that training development software including various sub-modules shown as supplied by Skillar to Design Tech were purchased by Skillar from various companies. The said companies are shell/defunct companies and they were issuing invoices without providing any s
State of Chattisgarh v. Aman Kumar Singh
Akram Ansariv. Chief Election Officer
Arnab Manoranjan Goswami v. State of Maharashtra and others
Dr.Subramanian Swamy v. Director, CBI
Dr.Subramanian Swamy v. Dr.Manmohan Singh
GJ Raja v. Tejraj Surana, (2019) 19 SCC 469
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur v. State of Maharashtra
Jitendra Kumar v. State of Orissa
K.R.Ramesh v. Central Bureau of Investigation
Krishna Ballabh Sahay and others v. Commission of Inquiry and others
Lalita Kumari v. State of U.P.
Ms. Mayawati v. Union of India and others
Neeharika Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra
P. Sirajuddin v. State of Madras
P.V.Jagannath Rao and others v. State of Orissa & others
Shambhu Nath Mishra v. State of Uttar Pradesh
State of Punjab v. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar & others
State of Rajasthan v. Tejmal Choudhary
State of Telangana v. Managipet @ Mangipet Sarveshwar Reddy
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Paras Nath Singh
Prior approval under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act is only required for offenses relating to public officials' duties; misconduct that constitutes a crime does not benefit from this....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of prior approval for investigation under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, as amended, and its implications f....
Enquiry or Inquiry or investigation of offences decision taken by public servant in discharge of official functions or duties - Once a constitutional court examines and satisfies itself about necessi....
No prior approval from the competent authority was necessary for investigation into the offence under Section 13(1) (a) of the Act alleged against him.
Point of law: Prevention of corruption – Good faith - Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act cannot be made applicable in those cases where the act of the public servant that amounts to an o....
Initiation of criminal proceeding – Absence of approval as contemplated in Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for conducting enquiry, inquiry or investigation of offences alleged to ha....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.