IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
P.B. BAJANTHRI, J.
Sri. Umashankar And Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The Commissioner Bangalore Development Authority And Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No.11021 of 2011 (LA-BDA)
Decided On : 22-04-2021
Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226 - BDA Act - Sections 17(5), 17(6) and 9(3) - Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4(1), Sub-section (2) of Section 16 - Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4 and 5 - U.L.C. Act - Section 34 - Preliminary notification - Acquisition of Land - Revenue - Possession of subject land Respondent No.1 - Development Authority initiated proceedings for acquisition of land for the purpose of formation of OMBR layout - Preliminary notification and final notification was issued. Portion of survey numbers in Binnamangala Village had been identified by the officials of the Revenue Department and BDA - acquisition of Sy.No. of Binnamangala Village to an extent of 1 guntas, number of correspondences took place –
Finding of the Court:
Mahazar relating to taking over the possession of the subject land is not in accordance with law wherein this Court has elaborately considered how a ‘mahazar’ should be drawn - Mahazar is not in a manuscript form and is a typed copy and addresses of the witnesses are not forth. If spot mahazar was done, in such an event, it should have been in manuscript having regard to of alleged mahazar drawn by the BDA. BDA has not complied with the procedure in taking over possession of the subject land by drawing mahazar - Having regard to the material information read with the arguments advanced on behalf of learned counsel for the BDA, such observation made by the Regional Commissioner, Bengaluru is hereby expunged –
Result:Writ Petition is allowed
ORDER :
In the instant petition, legal heirs of B.Doddamarappa have prayed for the following relief:-
2. Brief facts of the case are as follows:-
Respondent No.1 -Bangalore Development Authority (Herein after referred to as BDA, for short) initiated proceedings for acquisition of land for the purpose of formation of OMBR layout. On 03.11.1977 preliminary notification and on 13.11.1980 final notification was issued. Portion of survey numbers in Binnamangala Village had been identified by the officials of the Revenue Department and BDA. In the present case, for acquisition of Sy.No.78 of Binnamangala Village to an extent of 1 acre 12 guntas, number of correspondences took place among BDA, Revenue and Urban Development Departments. In the correspondences in respect of Sy.No.78 to an extent of 1 acre 12 guntas, Sri.A.Suklal's name is reflected in respect of acquisition. He has also claimed compensation, simultaneously, one Sri.A.Narayan had also claimed, who is stated to be brother of Sri A Suklal. On 01.04.1985 award in respect of Sy.No.78 was passed and it was approved by the Special Deputy Commissioner of BDA on 17.06.1985. It is stated that possession of the property bearing Survey No.78 was taken by drawing the mahazar on 03.10.1985. Sri.A.Suklal filed an application under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Hereinafter referred to as 'Act 1894' for short) for reference to the Civil Court. Pursuant to Sri.A.Suklal's application, BDA deposited the award amount in the Civil Court on 24.12.1986. Simultaneously, award amount in respect of Kharab land was forwarded to the office of the Tahasildar, North Taluk on 29.12.1986.
3. When things stood thus, Vyalikaval House Building Cooperative Society(Hereinafter referred to as 'Society' for short) stated to have requested the State Government for bulk allotment of land on 18.03.1987 and Government had issued certain directions to the BDA for allotment of lands on 18.05.1987 while invoking power under Section 65 of the Bengaluru Development Authority Act, 1976 (Hereinafter referred to as 'BDA Act' for short) while issuing notification. On 26.09.1987, Civil Court allowed the reference in favour of Sri.A.Suklal. Pursuant to the State Government's directions, BDA passed resolution No.1085 for bulk allotment in favour of Society on 28.06.1988. BDA handed over the possession of Sy.No.78 of Binnamangala to the Society on 07.02.1989 whereas the sale deed was entered in favour of the Society on 20.04.1989. Notification under Section 16(2) of the Act, 1894 was published in the official gazette on 05.12.1991.
4. In the meanwhile, Sri.A.Suklal and others filed W.P.No.5785/1996 and W.P.Nos.34830-34835/2001 connected with W.P.No.41414/1999 and W.P.Nos.34822-34829/2001 wherein the preliminary notification and final notification issued on 03.11.1977 and 13.11.1980 respectively were challenged and also sought for cancellation of Government Order dated 24.03.1995 and further, direction to the concerned respondent to restore the possession of the property in Sy.No.78 measuring 1 acre 12 guntas of Binnamangala Village. On the other hand, on 01.08.2001, Division Bench disposed of the writ petitions with the following observations:-
Bengalore Development Authority And Others Vs R Hanmaih And Others
Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnang v. Mst. Katiji
Commissioner of Customs, Kandla v. Essar Oil Limited
G. Ramegowda Major etc. v. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bangalore
Gowrishankar v. Joshi Amba Shankar Family Trust
HMT Housebuilding Coop. Society v. M. Venkatswamappa
HMT Housebuilding Coop. Society v. Syed Khader
Indian Bank v. Satyam Fibres (India) (P) Ltd.
Indrapuri Griha Nirman Sahakari Samiti Ltd Vs. The State Of Rajasthan And Others
J&K Housing Board v. Kunwar Sanjay Krishan Kaul
K.N Ashwathamaraya Shetty And Others V/S State Of Karataka
Kasani Gnaneshwar Vs The Joint Collector, Medchal-Malkaigiri Distraict & Others
Khawaja v. Secy. of State for Home Deptt.
Khub Chand v. State of Rajasthan.
Kulsum R. Nadiadwala Vs State Of Maharashtra And Others
Lazarus Estates Ltd. v. Beasley
Meghmala & Others. Vs G. Narasimha Reddy & Others
Narthern Indian Glass Industries V Jascant Singh And Others
Prem Kumar J.J V State Of Karnataka And Others
Ram Chandra Singh v. Savitri Devi
Ram Preeti Yadav v. U.P. Board of High School and Intermediate Education
Rameshwar And Others Vs State Of Haryana And Others
Regi Suresh Nair Vs Suresh Putharakkal Nair
S. B Subramanya Setty And Others Vs Ksrtc And Others
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu v. Jagannath
Smt Janet Shakuntala Maben And Others Vs State Of Karnataka & Others
State of Karnataka v. Y. Moideen Kunhi (dead) by Lrs.
Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Chennai Vs. M. Meiyappan And Others
Tilokchand Motichand v. H.B. Munshi
Uddar Gagan Vs Sant Singh & Ors
V. Chandrasekaran And Another Vs The Administrative Officer And Others
V.T Krishnamoorthy V/S State Of Karnataka
Vyalikaval House Building Coop Scoiety By Its Secretary Vs V. Chandrappa And Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.