Back
E. S. INDIRESH
K. Somanath Nayak – Appellant
Versus
D. Veerendra Heggade – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's observations on the procedural aspects and principles of law. (Para 3 , 4 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 26) |
| 3. arguments presented by the petitioner against the trial court's award of compensation. (Para 5 , 6 , 10 , 11 , 14 , 16 , 17 , 19) |
| 4. ratio decidendi surrounding disobedience of court orders. (Para 9 , 12 , 40 , 72 , 76 , 80) |
| 5. final conclusion and orders of the court. (Para 70 , 75 , 78) |
JUDGMENT/ORDER
E.S.INDIRESH, J. - This Writ Petition is filed assailing the order dtd. 22/3/2022 passed in MA No.8 of 2021 by Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC at Belthangady dismissing the appeal and confirming the order dtd. 8/6/2021 passed in Civil Miscellaneous Petition No.3 of 2015 on the file of the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Belthangady (hereinafter referred to as "the trial Court") allowing application IA.I filed under Order XXXIX Rule 2A read with Sec. 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure in Original Suit No.226 of 2013 before the trial Court.
FACTS OF THE CASE
2. The relevant facts for adjudication of this Writ Petition are that, the respondent herein is the plaintiff in Original Suit No.2
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
