IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A.S. Oka, A.K. Menon, JJ.
Rajiv Mohan Mishra – Petitioner
Vs.
City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. and others - Respondents.
Public Interest Litigation No.80 of 2013 Along With Civil Application No.54, 86 of 2016, 114, 134 of 2015, 33, 50 of 2017
Decided On : 02-11-2018
Constitution of India,1950 - Articles 14, 21, 19, 19(1) (e) , 16 and 22 - Tamil Nadu Town Country Planning Act,1971 - Section 113 - Land Acquisition Act,1894 - Sought to be destroyed - Acquisition of lands - Scale - Illegal constructions - Multi storied residential buildings - Acquired lands - Interim orders - City and Industrial Development of Maharashtra Limited - Government of Maharashtra owned Company was given a status of Special Planning Authority provisions of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 development commenced - Industrial estates of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation again is a statutory body created by State Government – Held, Revenue and Survey Officers Maharashtra Land Revenue Code,1966 shall render necessary cooperation to aforesaid Planning Authorities for carrying out survey - Work of carrying out survey shall be completed within a period of one year Judgment and Order is uploaded – Court direct aforesaid three Planning Authorities to file a quarterly report in Court setting out details of action taken for demolition of illegal constructions - Court Receiver appointed under the interim orders in PIL shall continue will submit reports on current status of buildings - After considering reports - Court will consider of discharging the Court - Civil Applications and Notices of Motion in the PILs if any, stand disposed of
A.S. OKA, J.
As can be seen from the administrative order passed by Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice on 6th February 2018 (which is on the file of PIL No. 82 of 2017), these matters have been specially assigned to this Bench.
1 One of the issues involved in this group of Public Interest Litigations is of the validity of section 52-A of the Maharashtra Regional and Town planning Act, 1966 which provides for en-bloc regularization of a very large number of illegal structures constructed in the State on or before 31st December 2015. The issue is whether the concept of town planning will be thrown to winds if the said provision is implemented. The contention is that the very concept of town planning is sought to be destroyed and defeated by enacting section 52-A. We are reminded of what Socrates said:
“By far the greatest and most admirable form of wisdom is that needed to plan and beautify cities and human communities.”
Benjamin Franklin supposedly said once
“If you fail to plan, you are planning to fail.”
OVERVIEW
2. With a view to reduce the congestion in the city of Mumbai, in early seventies, the twin city of Navi Mumbai was set up by taking recourse to en-bloc acquisition of lands under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act,1894 (for short ‘the Land Acquisition Act'). The City and Industrial Development of Maharashtra Limited (for short ‘CIDCO'), a Government of Maharashtra owned Company was given a status of Special Planning Authority under the provisions of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (for short ‘the MRTP Act'). Few years before the development of Navi Mumbai commenced, there was a large scale acquisition of lands in some areas of Navi Mumbai for setting up industrial estates of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (for short “MIDC”) which again is a statutory body created by the State Government under the provisions of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act,1961 (for short ‘the MIDC Act'). It is also a Planning Authority within the meaning of MRTP Act for certain area of Navi Mumbai. Industrial estates were set up on large scale by MIDC and at one stage, industrial belt known as ThaneBelapur Belt which is now a part of Navi Mumbai was known to be one of the largest industrial areas in Asia.
3. PIL Nos.138 of 2012 and 80 of 2013 have been filed for inviting attention of the Court to the large scale illegal constructions which have come up during the last few years in the city of Navi Mumbai (New Bombay).
4. The orders passed in PIL Nos.80 of 2013 and 138 of 2012 and the affidavits on record will show that there are large scale illegal constructions have come up in Navi Mumbai. The illegal constructions are not only of smaller structures or huts but of large multi storied residential buildings. The citizens have been persuaded to purchase flats/premises in the said illegal buildings. As can be seen from some of the orders passed in PIL Nos.80 of 2013 and 138 of 2012, in large number of cases, the persons have acquired flats with the full knowledge that the entire building is illegal. Most of the illegal constructions have come up on the lands which were compulsorily acquired by the State Government either for setting up city of Navi Mumbai or for industrial estate of MIDC by paying large amount by way of compensation. Not only that large amount by way of compensation has been paid to those whose lands were acquired for Navi Mumbai Project, but they were allotted developed plots having an area equivalent to 12.5% of the area of the acquired lands. The plots have been allotted at concessional rates. The land mafia has got into action in the city of Navi Mumbai which was once advertised as a “dream city” and has successfully carried out hundreds of illegal constructions.
5. For a part of Navi Mumbai, the Municipal Corporation of city of Navi Mumbai (for short ‘the said Corpor
A. Thangal Kunju Musaliar v. M. Venkatachalam Potti
A.G.Varadarajulu vs. State of T.N.
Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation vs. Nawab Khan Gulab Khan and others
Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi
Aswini Kumar Ghose v. Arabinda Bose
Avishek Goenka and Ors. v. Union of India
B.R.Enterprises vs. State of U.P.
Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab
Bakhtawar Trust and others vs. M.D.Narayan and others
Binoy Viswam vs Union of India
Chairman and MD, NTPC Ltd. v. Reshmi Constructions, Builders & Contractors
Chameli Singh and others Vs. State of U.P. and another
Consumer Action Group v. State of T.N.
Consumer Action Group vs. State of Tamil Nadu and others
D.S.Nakara and others vs. Union of India
Deena @ Deen Dayal and others vs. Union of India and others
Dipak K. Mukherjee vs. Kolkatta Municipal Corporation
Friends Colony Development Committee v. State of Orissa
Government of A.P vs. P. Lakshmi Devi
In re, Natural Resources Allocation
Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) (P) Ltd. v. Union of India
K. Ramadas Shenoy v. Town Municipal Council, Udipi
K.R. Lakshmanan v. State of T.N.
K.S.Puttaswamy Vs. Union of India
Kishan Prakash Sharma and others Vs. Union of India and others
M.I. Builders (P) Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu
Madhav Rao Scindia v. Union of India
Mahendra Baburao Mahadik vs. Subhash Krishna Kanitkar and others
Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248
Mark Netto vs. State of Kerala
Mohd. Arif v. Supreme Court of India
Pannalal Binjraj v. Union of India
Pleasant Stay Hotel v. Palani Hills Conservation Council
Pratibha Coop. Housing Society Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra
Priyanka Estates International (P) Ltd. v. State of Assam
Pune Municipal Corporation vs. Promoters and Builders
R. v. Secy. of State for Home Deptt., ex p Brind
Rajbala and others Vs. State of Haryana and others
Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India
Royal Paradise Hotel Pvt. Ltd vs. State of Haryana and others
Rustom Cavasjee Cooper v. Union of India
Shanti Sports Club v. Union of India
Shashikant Laxman Kale v. Union of India
Shayara Bano v. Union of India
State of A.P. v. McDowell and Co.
State of Bihar vs. Bihar Distillery
State of T.N. v. Ananthi Ammal
State of W.B.v. Union of India
Sudhir M. Khandwala vs. Mumbai Municipal Corporation and others
Sushil Kumar vs. Union of India
Virendra Gaur vs. State of Haryana
Welfare Association A.R.P. Maharashtra and another vs. Ranjit P. Gohil
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.