SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Prasanna B. Varale, S.M. Modak, JJ.
Nauman Suleman Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors. – Respondents
Criminal Application No. 636 of 2017
Decided On : 29-04-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Advocate, Datta Mane, for the Appellant; Mr. K. V. Saste, APP, Mr. Hrishikesh P. Hartalkar, for the Respondent.

The court can quash an FIR under Section 376 of Indian Penal Code and under Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act) based on the settlement of dispute between the parties and their agreement to marry, considering their future.

Headnote:

Quashing - Settlement of Dispute - The court accepted the request for quashing the FIR under Section 376 of Indian Penal Code and under Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act) based on the settlement of dispute between the parties and their agreement to marry, considering their future.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant was accused of an offence under Section 376 of Indian Penal Code and under Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act) based on a complaint filed by the father of the victim-girl for sexual abuse and harassment. However, during the pendency of the prosecution, the applicant settled the dispute with the victim-girl, who had become a major, and both parties agreed to marry.

Finding of the Court:

The court, after hearing the parties and considering the affidavits filed by the victim-girl and her parents, accepted the settlement and readiness of both parties to marry, and granted the request for quashing the FIR.

Issues: Settlement of dispute, readiness to marry, quashing of FIR

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision to quash the FIR was based on the settlement of the dispute between the parties, their agreement to marry, and the acceptance of the victim-girl's explanation regarding her previous statements.

Final Decision: The application was allowed, and the FIR was quashed and set aside. The applicant was directed to file an affidavit to that effect within 15 days, failing which the prosecution would revive.

JUDGMENT

S.M. Modak, J. - The applicant is accused in an offence bearing FIR No.I-240 of 2015 registered with Vashi Police Station under Section 376 of Indian Penal Code and under Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POSCO Act). The offence was registered on the complaint of, the father of the victim-girl. He filed complaint for sexual abuse and sexual harassment of her minor daughter by the applicant. The applicant was arrested. The police have also filed chargesheet and is pending as POSCO Special Act No. 198 of 2015 before the Special Court at Thane.

2 During pendency of the prosecution, through intervention and well wishers, applicant has settled the dispute with Respondent No.2. Now she has become major. Today, both the parties are present in the Court.

3 We have heard the learned Counsel for the applicant, learned APP and the learned Counsel for Respondent No.2.

4 We have read the affidavit filed by the victim-girl. Now, she is major. It seems that, they were in love with each other. Now they have decided to marry after settling in life in their respective careers. Her parents have also filed affidavits. They have given explanation of misunderstanding while lodging the FIR. Even now they have accepted the friendship in between their daughter and the appellant. The victimgirl tried to give an explanation about her statement recorded by the Police and learned Magistrate. She was tutored to give those statements. We are not accepting the said explanation.

5 We are inclined to accept the prayer for quashing for the reasons that both have agreed to marry. We accept her readiness as an undertaking given today to this Court. Victim-girl had given no objection for quashing. When the applicant is present in the Court, we also asked about his readiness to marry with the victim-girl, he has given an undertaking to marry to her. We have accepted as an undertaking given to the Court.

6 So we are inclined to accept the request for quashing the FIR, only by considering their future. If the prosecution still remains, it will come in their peaceful life.

7 Hence, the following order:-

    (a) Application is allowed.

    (b) FIR No.I-240 of 2015 registered with Vashi Police Station under Section 376 of Indian Penal Code and under Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POSCO Act), is quashed and set aside.

    (c) Applicant to file affidavit to that effect within 15 days. If the affidavit is not filed, then the prosecution will revive.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top