ARUN KUMAR JHA
Nilima Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Padamdev Narain – Respondent
Arun Kumar Jha, J. – The present petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the order dated 16.12.2023 passed in Misc. Appeal No. 37/2022 by the learned Additional District Judge-8th, Bhojpur at Ara dismissing the appeal and affirming the order dated 27.05.2022 passed by the learned Sub Judge- 8th, Bhojpur at Ara in Title Partition Suit No.531/2013 whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been ordered to demolish all constructions from the disputed land within three months from the date of order, failing which the District Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara was directed to remove any construction and make the land clear at the cost of the petitioner and also to attach any property lying on the land.
2. Briefly stated the facts leading to filing of the present case are that respondent no.1 instituted Title Partition Suit No. 531/2013 against his co-sharers claiming 1/12th share in the property mentioned in Schedule-2 of the plaint. The suit land measures about 14 acres. The relevant land appertains to Khata No. 152, Plot No. 360 in village-Paiga, P.S.-Barhara, District-Bhojpur and its total area is said to be 76 decimals. Admittedly, respondent nos. 4 and 5, who are the brothers
Meera Sahni vs. Lieutenant Governor of Delhi
State of Orissa vs. Sudhansu Sekhar Misra
Nawabkhan Abbaskhan vs. State of Gujarat
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu vs. Jagannath
Special Reference No. 1 of 1964
Thomson Press (India) Ltd. vs. Nanak Builders and Investors Pvt. Ltd.
Jehal Tanti vs. Nageshwar Singh (D) through Lrs
Tayabbhai M. Bagasarwalla vs. Hind Rubber Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Vidur Impex and Traders (P) Ltd. vs. Tosh Apartments (P) Ltd.
Samir Sobhan Sanyal vs. Tracks Trade Pvt. Ltd.
Meera Chauhan vs. Harsh Bishnoi
Parmal Singh (dead) through Lrs vs. Ghanshyam
Jugal Kishore Singh vs. Gobind Singh
Gajara Vishnu Gosavi vs. Prakash Nanasaheb Kamble
Dorab Cawasji Warden vs. Coomi Sorab Warden
Dular Chand Sah vs. Devnath Sah
Ghanshyam Sarda vs. Sashikant Jha
DDA vs. Skipper Construction Co. (P) Ltd.
S.P. Deshmukh vs. Shah Nihal Chand Waghajibhai Gujarati
Arun Kumar Jha vs. Pushpa Choudhary
Kesharlal H. Pardeshi vs. Vithal S. Patole (Dead) by LRs.
Valappil Ambunhi vs. Kunhambu Karanavan
Mani Nariman Daruwala vs. Phiroz N. Bhatena
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.